In 2014, after a long process of study and analysis, we came to the identification of the new red zone, i.e. the area for which the evacuation is the only preventive measure of the population. At the same time, twinnings were also redefined with the Regions and the Autonomous Provinces that will host the evacuated people. In 2015, the new yellow zone was approved, i.e. the area outside the red zone exposed to the significant fallout of volcanic ash and pyroclastic materials.
\nThe plan for the evacuation of the population of the red zone is currently being developed by the Campania Region, with the support of ACaMIR - Campania Agency for Mobility, Infrastructure and Networks. For the time being, the Campania Region has identified, within the activities of the working table coordinated by the Department of Civil Protection and composed of all the bodies has defined the general strategy for the transfer of the population to the twinned Regions and Autonomous Provinces.
\nThe red and yellow zones have been identified by the Department of Civil Protection, based on the recommendations of the scientific community, and in collaboration with the Campania Region. The starting point for the update of these areas was the document prepared by the working group \"Scenarios and alert states\" of the National Commission, established in 2003 to provide for the update of the National Emergency Plan for the Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei areas.
\nThe new red zone, unlike the one identified in the 2001 Plan, includes, in addition to an area exposed to the invasion of pyroclastic flows (red zone 1), also an area subject to high risk of collapse of the roofs of the buildings due to the accumulation of pyroclastic deposits (red zone 2). The redefinition of this area also includes the involvement of a number of municipalities that have been able to indicate, in agreement with the Region, which part of their territory will fall in the area to be evacuated out of prevention. Other municipalities were instead considered entirely on the basis of their administrative boundaries. The new red zone includes the territories of 25 municipalities in the provinces of Naples and Salerno, that is 7 municipalities more than the 18 provided for in the National Emergency Plan of 2001. The Directive of 14 February 2014 has identified the twinning between the towns of red zone and the Regions and Autonomous Provinces that will host the evacuated population. In addition, as required by the directive, March 31, 2015 were published in the Official Gazette of the operational guidelines on the basis of which components and operational structures of the National Service will have to update their emergency planning according to the red zone. These operational guidelines are contained in a decree of the Head of the Civil Protection Department and were developed in consultation with the Campania Region, and after consultation with the Joint Conference (joint headquarters of the State-Region conference and of the State-city and local governments conference).
\nIn the new yellow zone, made official with the directive of the President of the Council of Ministers on the Official Gazette on January 19, 2016, fall instead 63 municipalities and three districts of the Municipality of Naples. The definition of this area is based on recent studies and simulations of the distribution on the ground of volcanic ash produced by sub-Plinian eruption, which is the reference scenario for upgrade planning, and takes into account the historical statistics of the wind altitude.
\nIn particular, the yellow zone includes the territories for which it is necessary to plan the intervention of national and regional level to manage a possible emergency; in their territory, in fact, it is likely, that a quantity of ashes fallen may be such as to cause the collapse of the roofs, and this constrains the municipalities that are part of it to adapt their emergency planning. The fallout of volcanic ash can produce, locally, other consequences (such as the clogging of sewers and the difficulty of movement of vehicles) that may also affect a very large area, outside the yellow zone. Even these municipalities will have to update their emergency planning. Operational guidelines for updating the emergency planning for the yellow zone are expected to be issued, as done previously for the red zone.
\n
The landmark event. The document \"Scenarios and alert levels for the Vesuvius\" delivered from the National Commission identifies an explosive sub-Plinian eruption as a reference event for the National emergency Plan for the Vesuvius, confirming what was already assumed in the 2001 Plan.
\nThis scenario envisages:
\n• the formation of an eruptive column of several kilometers;
\n• the fall of volcanic bombs and blocks around the crater and smaller particles (ash and lapilli) up to several tens of kilometers away;
\n• the formation of pyroclastic flows that would flow down the volcano's slopes for a few kilometers.
Seismic activity may precede the eruption and accompany the different phases, causing particularly serious damage to buildings already burdened by the load of products launched in the first phase of the eruption.
\nThe eruptive scenarios expected. For the definition of the reference scenario, we have evaluated the probability of occurrence of different scenarios, corresponding to three types of explosive eruptions (with Plinian volcanic explosivity index VEI = 5, sub-Plinian eruption with VEI = 4 and violent Strombolian VEI = 3).
\nOn the basis of statistical studies, for the Vesuvius an event of less energy (VEI = 3) would be more likely (slightly above 70%), however, the experts considered that scenario to be taken as reference should be an explosive sub-Plinian eruption with VEI = 4 for the following reasons:
\n• has a conditional probability of occurrence that is quite high (slightly less than 30%);
\n• corresponds to a reasonable choice of \"acceptable risk\" given that the probability of this event will be exceeded by Plinian eruption with VEI = 5 is only 1%;
\n• geophysical data do not reveal the presence of a shallow magma chamber with sufficient volume to generate a Plinian eruption type.
Areas at risk planned for a sub-Plinian eruption, taken as the reference scenario for the new Vesuvius Plan, cover also those for Strombolian eruption, of less energy.
\nHowever, we underline that despite having been identified a sub-Plinian eruption as a key event, the present state of knowledge - should phenomena linked to a possible reactivation occur - it would not be possible to determine what type of possible eruption will be from the analysis of the precursors.
\nThe hazard areas. On the basis of the reference scenario and of the different hazard areas two zone of the Plan (yellow and red) have been defined ,for which different operating measures are envisaged. New specific operational indications will be elaborated to manage any effect connected to flooding phenomena and invasion caused by mud slides (lahar)
\nThe alert levels. The working group has decided to maintain the same alert levels provided in the 2001 Plan, which are a basic level (green), a level of attention (yellow), a pre-alarm level (orange) and an alarm level (red), in accordance with the provisions for most of the monitored volcanoes on our planet. The four levels of alert mark time before a possible resumption of eruptive activity.
\nCurrently, the alert level of Vesuvius is green, which means that there has been no abnormal phenomenon compared to the ordinary activity that has characterized the volcano for decades. The transition from one level of alert to the next one corresponds to the variation of the parameters (seismicity, ground deformation, composition of the gas in the fumarole, etc.) routinely monitored, 24/7, managed by the monitoring system of the Vesuvius observatory of Ingv and it involves a gradual increase in the probability of eruption of a reactivation of the volcano. Consequently, the increasing response of the civil protection system is modulated in accordingly, which culminates with the evacuation of the population present in the red zone (alarm level).
\n","value":"The landmark event. The document \"Scenarios and alert levels for the Vesuvius\" delivered from the National Commission identifies an explosive sub-Plinian eruption as a reference event for the National emergency Plan for the Vesuvius, confirming what was already assumed in the 2001 Plan.
\r\n
\r\nThis scenario envisages:
\r\n• the formation of an eruptive column of several kilometers;
\r\n• the fall of volcanic bombs and blocks around the crater and smaller particles (ash and lapilli) up to several tens of kilometers away;
\r\n• the formation of pyroclastic flows that would flow down the volcano's slopes for a few kilometers.
\r\n
\r\nSeismic activity may precede the eruption and accompany the different phases, causing particularly serious damage to buildings already burdened by the load of products launched in the first phase of the eruption.
\r\n
\r\nThe eruptive scenarios expected. For the definition of the reference scenario, we have evaluated the probability of occurrence of different scenarios, corresponding to three types of explosive eruptions (with Plinian volcanic explosivity index VEI = 5, sub-Plinian eruption with VEI = 4 and violent Strombolian VEI = 3).
\r\n
\r\nOn the basis of statistical studies, for the Vesuvius an event of less energy (VEI = 3) would be more likely (slightly above 70%), however, the experts considered that scenario to be taken as reference should be an explosive sub-Plinian eruption with VEI = 4 for the following reasons:
\r\n• has a conditional probability of occurrence that is quite high (slightly less than 30%);
\r\n• corresponds to a reasonable choice of \"acceptable risk\" given that the probability of this event will be exceeded by Plinian eruption with VEI = 5 is only 1%;
\r\n• geophysical data do not reveal the presence of a shallow magma chamber with sufficient volume to generate a Plinian eruption type.
\r\n
\r\nAreas at risk planned for a sub-Plinian eruption, taken as the reference scenario for the new Vesuvius Plan, cover also those for Strombolian eruption, of less energy.
\r\n
\r\nHowever, we underline that despite having been identified a sub-Plinian eruption as a key event, the present state of knowledge - should phenomena linked to a possible reactivation occur - it would not be possible to determine what type of possible eruption will be from the analysis of the precursors.
\r\n
\r\nThe hazard areas. On the basis of the reference scenario and of the different hazard areas two zone of the Plan (yellow and red) have been defined ,for which different operating measures are envisaged. New specific operational indications will be elaborated to manage any effect connected to flooding phenomena and invasion caused by mud slides (lahar)
The alert levels. The working group has decided to maintain the same alert levels provided in the 2001 Plan, which are a basic level (green), a level of attention (yellow), a pre-alarm level (orange) and an alarm level (red), in accordance with the provisions for most of the monitored volcanoes on our planet. The four levels of alert mark time before a possible resumption of eruptive activity.
\r\n
\r\nCurrently, the alert level of Vesuvius is green, which means that there has been no abnormal phenomenon compared to the ordinary activity that has characterized the volcano for decades. The transition from one level of alert to the next one corresponds to the variation of the parameters (seismicity, ground deformation, composition of the gas in the fumarole, etc.) routinely monitored, 24/7, managed by the monitoring system of the Vesuvius observatory of Ingv and it involves a gradual increase in the probability of eruption of a reactivation of the volcano. Consequently, the increasing response of the civil protection system is modulated in accordingly, which culminates with the evacuation of the population present in the red zone (alarm level).
The \"red zone\" is the area for which preventive evacuation is the only measure of protecting citizens. Unlike the one identified in the 2001 Plan, the new red zone includes, besides an area exposed to the invasion of pyroclastic flows, defined as \"red zone 1\", also an area subject to high risk of collapse of the roofs of buildings due to the accumulation of pyroclastic deposits (volcanic ash and lapilli), defined as the \"red zone two\".
\nStudies at the base of the redefinition of the red zone. The Working Group of the National Commission, which was responsible for the update of the Vesuvius Emergency Plan, has redefined the extent of the area exposed to pyroclastic flows, highlighting the necessity that the limits of the new red zone were expanded compared to the current Plan. The Major Risks Committee-Volcanic risk Sector, called by the Civil Protection Department to express an opinion on the matter, has compared the area identified in the document with the most recent studies on the topic. In particular, the results of the Working Group were compared with the line that identifies the area subject to average frequency of invasion by pyroclastic flows outlined in the 2010 scientific publication of Gurioli et al. \"Pyroclastic flow hazard assessment at Somma Vesuvius based on geological record”, deeming the studies broadly consistent. For the identification of areas exposed to a high risk of collapse of the building roofs, the results of the Project SPeeD were also considered , as they combined the analysis of load curves of the deposit of ash fallout with vulnerability data of the building rooftops.
\nList of municipalities in the red zone. As a result, the new red zone has been expanded, compared to that provided for in the 2001 Plan, including the territories of 25 municipalities. In addition to the 18 already indicated in the red zone (Boscoreale, Boscotrecase, Cercola, Ercolano, Massa di Somma, Ottaviano, Pollena Trocchia, Pompei, Portici, Sant’Anastasia, San Giorgio a Cremano, San Sebastiano al Vesuvio, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Somma Vesuviana, Terzigno, Torre Annunziata, Torre del Greco, Trecase), the following have been entirely included: Palma Campania, Poggiomarino, San Gennaro Vesuviano and Scafati and, only partially, the districts of Barra, Ponticelli and San Giovanni a Teduccio of the Municipality of Naples, the Municipality of Nola and the enclave of Pomigliano d’Arco in the Municipality of Sant’Anastasia.
\nRedefinition of the boundaries of the new red zone. In the first updated version of the National Emergency Plan outlined by the Department, the 24 municipalities and 3 districts of Naples were entirely included in the \"red zone\", taking as reference the administrative boundaries. The decision of the Department to consider the municipal limits - or of the municipality, in the case of Naples - is linked to the need to integrate, at a later stage, detailed operational information of the territory. For this reason, also in view of sharing and collaboration between all those involved in national planning, each municipality, in agreement with Campania Region, was asked to propose for the their territories, new boundaries of the \"red zone\" , as long as they proved to be able to handle partial evacuations of their communities. To carry out the new borders, the Department put down two conditions: that the boundaries were not smaller than the ones of the “red zone 1”, which is the one subject to the fall of pyroclastic flows; that the Municipalities in the red zone 2 could demonstrate to have reinforced the building rooftops exposed to the fall of pyroclastic deposits.
\nHowever, the Department deems appropriate that the 18 municipalities already listed in the old Plan keep the administrative boundaries as perimeter of the red zone, due to the achieved awareness over the years by such communities to live in an area exposed to a high volcanic risk and the effort carried out by some local boards to adopt proper prevention measures.
\nThree municipalities have proposed new boundaries: the City of Naples, the City of Nola and Pomigliano d'Arco. For all other municipalities, administrative boundaries are considered as boundaries of the new red zone. The proposed changes were accepted by the Regional Council with the July 26, 2013 deliberation, and subsequently approved on 14 February 2014 in the Prime Minister's Directive, which was received by the Joint Conference on 6 February 2014.
\nPlanning of operating structures and components of the National Service. As provided for by the 14 February 2014 directive, on 31 March 2015 the decree of the Head of Department of civil protection that contains the operating instructions that the National Service's components and structures should follow to update their respective emergency plans in case of evacuation of the red zone. In fact, only when the criteria and the general strategies will be applied in the planning of all involved parties, the National Emergency Plan can become a truly operational tool.
\nSpecifically, the directions are divided into six different sections. After a part describing the general strategy that all National Service will need to follow in the operational stages corresponding to levels of alert attention, pre-alarm and alarm, the document contains the addresses for internal, sectorial and communication planning. In particular:
\n- internal planning provide for procedures and actions for the protection of human resources and tools that each component or operational structure has in the red zone
\n- sector planning will ensure the response of components and operational structures at various operational stages and the integration and harmonization of the actions of the various government departments and agencies to achieve the overall objectives
\n- communication plans provide a schedule of information and communication activities of components and operational structures at different stages.
The document defines also the necessary elements for the Campania Region, local authorities concerned and to the regions and autonomous provinces to develop plans to evacuate the population from the red zone and transfer and welcome them. Specific indications are given also to the Region Campania and local authorities to upgrade their emergency planning. One chapter is dedicated to the planning and general coordination for which the Civil Protection Department is in charge, while the last part of the document provides elements for ensuring the continuity of local authorities.
\nTables and charts referred to in the document “Eruptive scenarios and alert levels” are not attached because they are too heavy. The Department can provide them to any institution upon request.
\n","value":"The \"red zone\" is the area for which preventive evacuation is the only measure of protecting citizens. Unlike the one identified in the 2001 Plan, the new red zone includes, besides an area exposed to the invasion of pyroclastic flows, defined as \"red zone 1\", also an area subject to high risk of collapse of the roofs of buildings due to the accumulation of pyroclastic deposits (volcanic ash and lapilli), defined as the \"red zone two\".
\r\n
\r\nStudies at the base of the redefinition of the red zone. The Working Group of the National Commission, which was responsible for the update of the Vesuvius Emergency Plan, has redefined the extent of the area exposed to pyroclastic flows, highlighting the necessity that the limits of the new red zone were expanded compared to the current Plan. The Major Risks Committee-Volcanic risk Sector, called by the Civil Protection Department to express an opinion on the matter, has compared the area identified in the document with the most recent studies on the topic. In particular, the results of the Working Group were compared with the line that identifies the area subject to average frequency of invasion by pyroclastic flows outlined in the 2010 scientific publication of Gurioli et al. \"Pyroclastic flow hazard assessment at Somma Vesuvius based on geological record”, deeming the studies broadly consistent. For the identification of areas exposed to a high risk of collapse of the building roofs, the results of the Project SPeeD were also considered , as they combined the analysis of load curves of the deposit of ash fallout with vulnerability data of the building rooftops.
\r\n
\r\nList of municipalities in the red zone. As a result, the new red zone has been expanded, compared to that provided for in the 2001 Plan, including the territories of 25 municipalities. In addition to the 18 already indicated in the red zone (Boscoreale, Boscotrecase, Cercola, Ercolano, Massa di Somma, Ottaviano, Pollena Trocchia, Pompei, Portici, Sant’Anastasia, San Giorgio a Cremano, San Sebastiano al Vesuvio, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Somma Vesuviana, Terzigno, Torre Annunziata, Torre del Greco, Trecase), the following have been entirely included: Palma Campania, Poggiomarino, San Gennaro Vesuviano and Scafati and, only partially, the districts of Barra, Ponticelli and San Giovanni a Teduccio of the Municipality of Naples, the Municipality of Nola and the enclave of Pomigliano d’Arco in the Municipality of Sant’Anastasia.
\r\n
\r\nRedefinition of the boundaries of the new red zone. In the first updated version of the National Emergency Plan outlined by the Department, the 24 municipalities and 3 districts of Naples were entirely included in the \"red zone\", taking as reference the administrative boundaries. The decision of the Department to consider the municipal limits - or of the municipality, in the case of Naples - is linked to the need to integrate, at a later stage, detailed operational information of the territory. For this reason, also in view of sharing and collaboration between all those involved in national planning, each municipality, in agreement with Campania Region, was asked to propose for the their territories, new boundaries of the \"red zone\" , as long as they proved to be able to handle partial evacuations of their communities. To carry out the new borders, the Department put down two conditions: that the boundaries were not smaller than the ones of the “red zone 1”, which is the one subject to the fall of pyroclastic flows; that the Municipalities in the red zone 2 could demonstrate to have reinforced the building rooftops exposed to the fall of pyroclastic deposits.
\r\n
\r\nHowever, the Department deems appropriate that the 18 municipalities already listed in the old Plan keep the administrative boundaries as perimeter of the red zone, due to the achieved awareness over the years by such communities to live in an area exposed to a high volcanic risk and the effort carried out by some local boards to adopt proper prevention measures.
\r\n
\r\nThree municipalities have proposed new boundaries: the City of Naples, the City of Nola and Pomigliano d'Arco. For all other municipalities, administrative boundaries are considered as boundaries of the new red zone. The proposed changes were accepted by the Regional Council with the July 26, 2013 deliberation, and subsequently approved on 14 February 2014 in the Prime Minister's Directive, which was received by the Joint Conference on 6 February 2014.
Planning of operating structures and components of the National Service. As provided for by the 14 February 2014 directive, on 31 March 2015 the decree of the Head of Department of civil protection that contains the operating instructions that the National Service's components and structures should follow to update their respective emergency plans in case of evacuation of the red zone. In fact, only when the criteria and the general strategies will be applied in the planning of all involved parties, the National Emergency Plan can become a truly operational tool.
\r\n
\r\nSpecifically, the directions are divided into six different sections. After a part describing the general strategy that all National Service will need to follow in the operational stages corresponding to levels of alert attention, pre-alarm and alarm, the document contains the addresses for internal, sectorial and communication planning. In particular:
\r\n- internal planning provide for procedures and actions for the protection of human resources and tools that each component or operational structure has in the red zone
\r\n- sector planning will ensure the response of components and operational structures at various operational stages and the integration and harmonization of the actions of the various government departments and agencies to achieve the overall objectives
\r\n- communication plans provide a schedule of information and communication activities of components and operational structures at different stages.
The document defines also the necessary elements for the Campania Region, local authorities concerned and to the regions and autonomous provinces to develop plans to evacuate the population from the red zone and transfer and welcome them. Specific indications are given also to the Region Campania and local authorities to upgrade their emergency planning. One chapter is dedicated to the planning and general coordination for which the Civil Protection Department is in charge, while the last part of the document provides elements for ensuring the continuity of local authorities.
\r\n\r\nTables and charts referred to in the document “Eruptive scenarios and alert levels” are not attached because they are too heavy. The Department can provide them to any institution upon request.
\r\n"},"relationships":{"field_immagine":null,"field_video":null,"field_link_interni":[]},"drupal_internal__id":17895},{"field_titolo":"Twinnings and evacuation plan","field_tabella":null,"field_testo":{"processed":"Twinning scheme. To guarantee assistance to the population of the municipalities in the red zone, in the directive of the President of the Council of Ministers of February 14, 2014, the twinning scheme to be implemented between these municipalities and the Regions and the Autonomous Provinces in the case of preventive evacuation was redefined.
\nThe twinning scheme envisages that the population of Portici will be assisted in Piedmont; of Nola in Valle D'Aosta; of Cercola in Liguria; of Torre del Greco and Somma Vesuviana in Lombardy; of Pollena Trocchia in Trentino Alto Adige; of San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Sant'Anastasia (including the enclave of Pomigliano D'Arco) in Veneto; of Palma Campania in Friuli Venezia-Giulia; of Ercolano in Emilia Romagna; of San Giorgio a Cremano in Tuscany; of San Gennaro Vesuviano in Umbria; of Poggiomarino in the Marche; of Ottaviano and the districts of Naples in Lazio; of Terzigno in Abruzzo; of Massa di Somma in Molise; of Torre Annunziata and San Sebastiano al Vesuvio in Puglia; of Boscotrecase in Basilicata; of Boscoreale in Calabria; of Scafati and Trecase in Sicily; and Pompeii in Sardinia. In order to make twinning operations operative, the Regions and the Autonomous Provinces will have to sign memorandums of understanding with the Campania Region and the municipalities in the red zone, in agreement with the Department.
\nEvacuation plan for the population from the red zone. In order to regulate the displacement of the people to be evacuated, an evacuation plan of the population has been drawn up. The document was drafted with the aim of carrying out the evacuation in 72 hours, with a simultaneous departure and divided into phases from all the Municipalities of the red zone, in the precautionary hypothesis that the removal, both spontaneous and assisted, of all its 670 thousand inhabitants occur simultaneously (and that there have therefore been no previous spontaneous departures). In particular, the assisted movement of people from the \"waiting areas\", defined in the Civil Protection Plan of each Municipality, to the \"meeting areas\", identified just outside the red zone, will take place with coaches made available by the Campania Region while the their transfer to the \"points of first reception\" in the Regions and autonomous twinned provinces can take place in different ways (coaches, trains or ships) depending on the destinations, to limit the load on the mobility infrastructure and the inconvenience to the population. People can also choose to move independently, with their own means of transport. In this case, they will be able to do so by following the road exits from the red zone established in the plan and then proceed directly to the \"First Reception Points\" identified in the twinned Regions and Autonomous Regions. In both cases, however, the exit from the red zone will have to take place through the \"gates\" identified in the Plan.
\nThe \"Meeting Areas\" together with the transfer modalities of the population from the red zone have been formalized with the decision of theCampania Region n.8 of 17 January 2017.
\nThe Plan for the evacuation of the population of the red zone is being developed by the Campania Region, with the support of ACaMIR - Campania Agency for Mobility, Infrastructure and Networks, in connection with the municipalities concerned. At present the Campania Region has identified, within the activities of the working table coordinated by the Department of Civil Protection and composed of all the bodies and companies with competence in the management of mobility of national importance, the meeting areas and has been defined the general strategy for the transfer of the population to the twinned Regions and Autonomous Provinces.
\nIn order to guarantee the correct management of the road network and railway traffic, planning activities are underway by Viabilità Italia, in conjunction with the Operational Roads Committees (Cov) of the various Prefectures, and, for the railway part, network operators and companies operating on long-distance lines. The activities necessary for the activation of the naval transport system will also be established.
\nTwinned Regions and autonomous Provinces must draw up specific plans for the transfer of the population evacuated from the red zone and for the reception on their territory.
\nModel of intervention of the National Civil Protection Service. In conjunction with the Campania Region, the Civil Protection Department has developed a model of intervention to be implemented in case of transition from the current state of equilibrium of the Vesuvius (green level) to the levels of yellow, orange and red alert, with the consequent activation of the different operating phases (attention, pre-alarm and alarm).
\nThe model in particular defines the organization of the National Civil Protection Service in carrying out the operational activities necessary to manage any emergencies (from the activation of the operational Committee, to the structuring of Di.Coma.C and the operational and coordination centers in the area. ). This document has already been shared with the components and operational structures of civil protection and, soon, it will be formalized in a specific document that will define the details.
Twinning scheme. To guarantee assistance to the population of the municipalities in the red zone, in the directive of the President of the Council of Ministers of February 14, 2014, the twinning scheme to be implemented between these municipalities and the Regions and the Autonomous Provinces in the case of preventive evacuation was redefined.
\r\n
\r\nThe twinning scheme envisages that the population of Portici will be assisted in Piedmont; of Nola in Valle D'Aosta; of Cercola in Liguria; of Torre del Greco and Somma Vesuviana in Lombardy; of Pollena Trocchia in Trentino Alto Adige; of San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Sant'Anastasia (including the enclave of Pomigliano D'Arco) in Veneto; of Palma Campania in Friuli Venezia-Giulia; of Ercolano in Emilia Romagna; of San Giorgio a Cremano in Tuscany; of San Gennaro Vesuviano in Umbria; of Poggiomarino in the Marche; of Ottaviano and the districts of Naples in Lazio; of Terzigno in Abruzzo; of Massa di Somma in Molise; of Torre Annunziata and San Sebastiano al Vesuvio in Puglia; of Boscotrecase in Basilicata; of Boscoreale in Calabria; of Scafati and Trecase in Sicily; and Pompeii in Sardinia. In order to make twinning operations operative, the Regions and the Autonomous Provinces will have to sign memorandums of understanding with the Campania Region and the municipalities in the red zone, in agreement with the Department.
\r\n
\r\nEvacuation plan for the population from the red zone. In order to regulate the displacement of the people to be evacuated, an evacuation plan of the population has been drawn up. The document was drafted with the aim of carrying out the evacuation in 72 hours, with a simultaneous departure and divided into phases from all the Municipalities of the red zone, in the precautionary hypothesis that the removal, both spontaneous and assisted, of all its 670 thousand inhabitants occur simultaneously (and that there have therefore been no previous spontaneous departures). In particular, the assisted movement of people from the \"waiting areas\", defined in the Civil Protection Plan of each Municipality, to the \"meeting areas\", identified just outside the red zone, will take place with coaches made available by the Campania Region while the their transfer to the \"points of first reception\" in the Regions and autonomous twinned provinces can take place in different ways (coaches, trains or ships) depending on the destinations, to limit the load on the mobility infrastructure and the inconvenience to the population. People can also choose to move independently, with their own means of transport. In this case, they will be able to do so by following the road exits from the red zone established in the plan and then proceed directly to the \"First Reception Points\" identified in the twinned Regions and Autonomous Regions. In both cases, however, the exit from the red zone will have to take place through the \"gates\" identified in the Plan.
\r\n
\r\nThe \"Meeting Areas\" together with the transfer modalities of the population from the red zone have been formalized with the decision of theCampania Region n.8 of 17 January 2017.
The Plan for the evacuation of the population of the red zone is being developed by the Campania Region, with the support of ACaMIR - Campania Agency for Mobility, Infrastructure and Networks, in connection with the municipalities concerned. At present the Campania Region has identified, within the activities of the working table coordinated by the Department of Civil Protection and composed of all the bodies and companies with competence in the management of mobility of national importance, the meeting areas and has been defined the general strategy for the transfer of the population to the twinned Regions and Autonomous Provinces.
\r\n
\r\nIn order to guarantee the correct management of the road network and railway traffic, planning activities are underway by Viabilità Italia, in conjunction with the Operational Roads Committees (Cov) of the various Prefectures, and, for the railway part, network operators and companies operating on long-distance lines. The activities necessary for the activation of the naval transport system will also be established.
Twinned Regions and autonomous Provinces must draw up specific plans for the transfer of the population evacuated from the red zone and for the reception on their territory.
\r\n
\r\nModel of intervention of the National Civil Protection Service. In conjunction with the Campania Region, the Civil Protection Department has developed a model of intervention to be implemented in case of transition from the current state of equilibrium of the Vesuvius (green level) to the levels of yellow, orange and red alert, with the consequent activation of the different operating phases (attention, pre-alarm and alarm).
\r\nThe model in particular defines the organization of the National Civil Protection Service in carrying out the operational activities necessary to manage any emergencies (from the activation of the operational Committee, to the structuring of Di.Coma.C and the operational and coordination centers in the area. ). This document has already been shared with the components and operational structures of civil protection and, soon, it will be formalized in a specific document that will define the details.
The \"yellow zone\" is the area, outside the red zone, that in case of eruption of Vesuvius is exposed to a significant fallout of volcanic ash and pyroclastic materials. In fact, the reference event for updating the plan, a sub-Plinian eruption type, involves the formation of an eruptive column of ash and volcanic gases that can rise to 10-20 km above the mouth of the volcano. On reaching this height, the eruption column is normally bent by the wind and the solid material falls to the ground, in the area downwind, resulting in a continuous and dense rain of ash and lapilli.
\nIn a few hours, the continuous emission of this material may lead to considerable accumulation of volcanic ash within a radius of 10-15 km from the volcano. Thicknesses smaller but still important for planning purposes can affect an area of 300-1000 km2 and distances of 20-50 km from the Vesuvius. The size of the area exposed to the fallout of volcanic ash depends on the height of the eruption column, the direction and speed of wind at this time of the eruption.
\nStudies and documents at the basis of the yellow zone redefinition. As for the red zone updating, the new proposal of the yellow zone descends from the document \"eruptive scenarios and alert levels\", delivered to the Department of Civil Protection in April 2012 by the Working Group of the National Commission in charge of updating the emergency planning for the Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei areas.
\nThe update of the yellow zone also took into account the results of the studies and simulations undertaken under the project \"Scenarios of hazard and damage\" (SPeeD), funded under the framework agreement signed between the Civil Protection Department and Division of Civil Protection of the Region Campania on 21 July 2006.
\nIn addition, the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology - INGV was asked to further study on the statistical dispersion of volcanic ash issued in case of eruption, taking into account the different models of wind on a medium-high straight, to date available.
\nCriteria for the redefinition of the yellow zone. Based on the reference event in question, that is a \"sub-Plinian\" explosive eruption (height of the eruption column of 18 km), the INGV study evaluated the distribution of volcanic ash on the ground, also in function of variable wind . In particular, probability maps have been produced that highlight the areas where it is possible an accumulation of ashes equal to 20-40 cm (200-400 kg / m2), able to cause the collapse of roofs with medium-low resistance.
\nIn line with what has already been considered in the emergency plan of 1995, then updated in 2001, the Civil Protection Department, in accordance with the Campania Region, outlined the yellow area on the basis of the curve of probability of 5% relative to a load of volcanic ash of 300 kg/m2.
\nList of municipalities in the yellow zone. There are 63 Municipalities and three districts of the Municipality of Naples. They are: Agerola, Angri, Avella, Baiano, Bracigliano, Brusciano, Camposano, Carbonara di Nola, Casalnuovo di Napoli, Casamarciano, Casola di Napoli, Castel San Giorgio, Castellammare di Stabia, Castello di Cisterna, Cava de' Tirreni, Cimitile, Comiziano, Corbara, Domicella, Forino, Gragnano, Lauro, Lettere, Liveri, Mariglianella, Marigliano, Marzano di Nola, Mercato San Severino, Meta, Monteforte Irpino, Moschiano, Mugnano del Cardinale, Nocera Inferiore, Nocera Superiore, Nola, Pagani, Pago del Vallo di Lauro, Pimonte, Pomigliano d'Arco, Positano, Quindici, Ravello, Roccapiemonte, San Marzano sul Sarno, San Paolo Bel Sito, San Valentino Torio, San Vitaliano, Santa Maria la Carità, Sant'Antonio Abate, Sant'Egidio del Monte Albino, Sarno, Saviano, Scala, Scisciano, Siano, Sperone, Striano, Taurano, Tramonti, Tufino, Vico Equense, Visciano and Volla. Within the municipality of Naples there are the districts of Barra, Ponticelli and San Giovanni a Teduccio.
\nFor these municipalities, as well as the planning of the intervention of national and regional level, the establishment of specific measures will have to be expected in the municipal plans, as temporary removals of the population residing in buildings made vulnerable or hard to reach by the accumulation of ashes may be necessary. However, the operational strategies set out in the plans will have to be diversified and \"dynamic\", because the area exposed to the fallout of ash cannot be identified a priori, but it will only be possible during the event, according to the wind direction and to the actual scale of the volcanic event.
\nThe new yellow zone was approved by the 9 February 2015 resolution of Campania Region and subsequently officialised by the Prime Minister's Directive issued on January 19, 2016 in the Official Gazette. The Directive assignes to the Head of Department, in agreement with the Campania Region, after hearing the Joint Conference, the task to provide he various components and structures of the National service of civil protection indications to update their respective emergency plans to safeguard the population in the yellow zone. Based on them, components and operating structures shall prepare, update and adapt their respective emergency plans.
\nMunicipalities outside the yellow zone. Even areas outside the yellow area may be affected by significant impact of ash that can cause major impact on services and networks (such as clogging of sewers, difficulty of vehicle circulation, interruption of power lines and communications). On the basis of the curves of excess probability of 5% relative to the loads of volcanic ash amounting to 200, 100 and 50 kg / m2, these additional areas were then identified, where there are possible heaps of ashes equal to 20, 10 to 5 cm. The municipalities that fall in this area will have to include in their plans specific directions to deal with the consequences caused by the accumulation of ash, with particular reference to the measures needed to restore the functionality of all essential services.
\n","value":"The \"yellow zone\" is the area, outside the red zone, that in case of eruption of Vesuvius is exposed to a significant fallout of volcanic ash and pyroclastic materials. In fact, the reference event for updating the plan, a sub-Plinian eruption type, involves the formation of an eruptive column of ash and volcanic gases that can rise to 10-20 km above the mouth of the volcano. On reaching this height, the eruption column is normally bent by the wind and the solid material falls to the ground, in the area downwind, resulting in a continuous and dense rain of ash and lapilli.
\r\n
\r\nIn a few hours, the continuous emission of this material may lead to considerable accumulation of volcanic ash within a radius of 10-15 km from the volcano. Thicknesses smaller but still important for planning purposes can affect an area of 300-1000 km2 and distances of 20-50 km from the Vesuvius. The size of the area exposed to the fallout of volcanic ash depends on the height of the eruption column, the direction and speed of wind at this time of the eruption.
\r\n
\r\nStudies and documents at the basis of the yellow zone redefinition. As for the red zone updating, the new proposal of the yellow zone descends from the document \"eruptive scenarios and alert levels\", delivered to the Department of Civil Protection in April 2012 by the Working Group of the National Commission in charge of updating the emergency planning for the Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei areas.
\r\n
\r\nThe update of the yellow zone also took into account the results of the studies and simulations undertaken under the project \"Scenarios of hazard and damage\" (SPeeD), funded under the framework agreement signed between the Civil Protection Department and Division of Civil Protection of the Region Campania on 21 July 2006.
\r\n
\r\nIn addition, the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology - INGV was asked to further study on the statistical dispersion of volcanic ash issued in case of eruption, taking into account the different models of wind on a medium-high straight, to date available.
Criteria for the redefinition of the yellow zone. Based on the reference event in question, that is a \"sub-Plinian\" explosive eruption (height of the eruption column of 18 km), the INGV study evaluated the distribution of volcanic ash on the ground, also in function of variable wind . In particular, probability maps have been produced that highlight the areas where it is possible an accumulation of ashes equal to 20-40 cm (200-400 kg / m2), able to cause the collapse of roofs with medium-low resistance.
\r\n
\r\nIn line with what has already been considered in the emergency plan of 1995, then updated in 2001, the Civil Protection Department, in accordance with the Campania Region, outlined the yellow area on the basis of the curve of probability of 5% relative to a load of volcanic ash of 300 kg/m2.
List of municipalities in the yellow zone. There are 63 Municipalities and three districts of the Municipality of Naples. They are: Agerola, Angri, Avella, Baiano, Bracigliano, Brusciano, Camposano, Carbonara di Nola, Casalnuovo di Napoli, Casamarciano, Casola di Napoli, Castel San Giorgio, Castellammare di Stabia, Castello di Cisterna, Cava de' Tirreni, Cimitile, Comiziano, Corbara, Domicella, Forino, Gragnano, Lauro, Lettere, Liveri, Mariglianella, Marigliano, Marzano di Nola, Mercato San Severino, Meta, Monteforte Irpino, Moschiano, Mugnano del Cardinale, Nocera Inferiore, Nocera Superiore, Nola, Pagani, Pago del Vallo di Lauro, Pimonte, Pomigliano d'Arco, Positano, Quindici, Ravello, Roccapiemonte, San Marzano sul Sarno, San Paolo Bel Sito, San Valentino Torio, San Vitaliano, Santa Maria la Carità, Sant'Antonio Abate, Sant'Egidio del Monte Albino, Sarno, Saviano, Scala, Scisciano, Siano, Sperone, Striano, Taurano, Tramonti, Tufino, Vico Equense, Visciano and Volla. Within the municipality of Naples there are the districts of Barra, Ponticelli and San Giovanni a Teduccio.
\r\n\r\nFor these municipalities, as well as the planning of the intervention of national and regional level, the establishment of specific measures will have to be expected in the municipal plans, as temporary removals of the population residing in buildings made vulnerable or hard to reach by the accumulation of ashes may be necessary. However, the operational strategies set out in the plans will have to be diversified and \"dynamic\", because the area exposed to the fallout of ash cannot be identified a priori, but it will only be possible during the event, according to the wind direction and to the actual scale of the volcanic event.
\r\n
\r\nThe new yellow zone was approved by the 9 February 2015 resolution of Campania Region and subsequently officialised by the Prime Minister's Directive issued on January 19, 2016 in the Official Gazette. The Directive assignes to the Head of Department, in agreement with the Campania Region, after hearing the Joint Conference, the task to provide he various components and structures of the National service of civil protection indications to update their respective emergency plans to safeguard the population in the yellow zone. Based on them, components and operating structures shall prepare, update and adapt their respective emergency plans.
Municipalities outside the yellow zone. Even areas outside the yellow area may be affected by significant impact of ash that can cause major impact on services and networks (such as clogging of sewers, difficulty of vehicle circulation, interruption of power lines and communications). On the basis of the curves of excess probability of 5% relative to the loads of volcanic ash amounting to 200, 100 and 50 kg / m2, these additional areas were then identified, where there are possible heaps of ashes equal to 20, 10 to 5 cm. The municipalities that fall in this area will have to include in their plans specific directions to deal with the consequences caused by the accumulation of ash, with particular reference to the measures needed to restore the functionality of all essential services.
\r\n"},"relationships":{"field_immagine":null,"field_video":null,"field_link_interni":[]},"drupal_internal__id":17897},{"field_titolo":"From 2003 to 2018","field_tabella":null,"field_testo":{"processed":"2003 - Reconstitution of the National Commission
\n2006 - Mesimex International Exercise on Mount Vesuvius
\n2007/2008 - Changes made to the Plan
\n2012 -The new scenario for the National Plan
\n2012 - Alert levels for the new plan
\n2012/2013 - Training activities on volcanic risk in the Vesuvius area
\n2013/2014 - Definitive delimitation of the red zone and twinnings
\n2014 - Training activities in the Vesuvius and Phlegrean Fields areas
\n2015 - New yellow zone and addresses to operating components and structures for the red zone
\n2016 - Publication of the resolution of the President of Council that officialises the yellow zone
\n2016/2017 - Presentation of the Plan to evacuate people from the red zone
\n2017/2018 – Intervention model to activate in case of yellow, orange or red alert
2003 - Reconstitution of the National Commission. The first National Emergency Plan for Vesuvius was drafted in 1995 by two national commissions, set up in 1991 and 1993, to assess the risk involved in the Vesuvius eruption and plan the response to any emergency. In 2001, the \"Additions and Variations\" in different sections of the Plan were approved. In 2002, a National Commission is reconstituted with the goal of having an ordinary instrument for the continuous updating of the planning and the Head of the Department of Civil Protection, by decree no.698 of 6 March 6 2003, he appoints the members. In particular, the Working Group made up of experts in volcanic risk is entrusted with the revision of the scenarios and levels of alert for a national emergency.
\n2006 - Mesimex International Exercise on Mount Vesuvius. A first test of the activities carried out by the new Commission was organized in 2006, with the international exercise Mesimex - SIMulation Major Emergency Exercise - a volcanic eruption of Mount Vesuvius was simulated to test and improve emergency procedures, including 'evacuation of the inhabitants of the towns in the red zone. The Civil Protection Department coordinated the exercise that involved four EU member states - France, Spain, Portugal and Sweden, testing their ability to respond within the European Civil Protection Mechanism. In particular, during the exercise, the viability plan for the Vesuvius area has been tested. The plan was prepared in 2006 by the Civil Protection Department, in collaboration with Hydraulics Traffic and Transport Department of La Sapienza University of Rome, which set out the main evacuation routes from towns in the red zone in case of eruption.
\n2007/2008 – Changes made to the Plan. Following the exercise, some changes to the National Plan of emergency for the area of Vesuvius were introduced in 2001, shared at a meeting of 23 April 2007 by the Civil Protection Department, Vesuvius Observatory Ingv Region Campania, Prefecture - Utg and the Province of Naples. The changes introduced were not made official in the updated document because in 2006 it was already in the activities of the group, responsible for defining the new scenario, which would have formed the basis for a comprehensive review of the Plan. In particular, during the meeting the following were confirmed: a sub-Plinian eruption as a reference event, the definition of red zone established in 2001, the three levels of warning before an eruption - attention, pre-alarm, alarm. On the other hand, the need to redefine the yellow area, i.e. the area subject to the fallout of ashes and lapilli, and the blue area, potentially subject to flooding and flooding, as well as to the fallout of ashes and lapilli, was highlighted. With regard to the operational measures envisaged in the Plan, twinning was confirmed between Vesuvian municipalities and Italian regions for the hospitality of the evacuated population. Evacuation of health care facilities and launching initiatives to safeguard the cultural heritage are now again considered part of the pre-alarm phase, whereas the alarm phase includes the evacuation of the red zone within 72 hours and no more than 7 days, as provided in the Plan of 2001. What emerged was the importance of redefining how the evacuation of the population would be carried out, according to the measurements in the Traffic Plan. In particular, the evacuation has been organized in two phases: the first one provides for the displacement of the population in areas of first aid immediately outside the area at risk (red and yellow zones), and a second one which provides for the transfer in the twinned regions . The means chosen for evacuation are road transport, and other means (trains and ships) are kept as a strategic reserve.
\n(The Traffic Plan and its attachments are available in the annex, whereas the tables relating to the Plan are not published because the files are too heavy for the website. However, they can be obtained from the Department.)
\nAt the same meeting, lines under the responsibility of various local administrations involved were also defined, with particular reference to the population census and reception facilities and evacuation plans in detail. After the meeting, Department, Region,
\nPrefecture - Utg and the Province of Naple organized various meetings with municipal technicians in the red zone to agree on the plan for general traffic, accepting any additions and amendments proposed by local governments, where possible.
2012 – The new scenario for the National Plan. On 26 April 2012 the Department has received from the working group of the National Commission for the emergency plan a document regarding new scenarios and alert levels, on the basis of which the different risk zones and their operational strategies will be redefined. The document of the scenarios was submitted on 27 June 2012 for the assessment of the National Major Risks Commission - Sector Volcanic Risk that was found consistent with the most recent studies on the topic. From this moment on, the Department has initiated a series of discussions with the Campania Region to collect the information necessary for redefining the red zone, which now includes the territories of 25 municipalities in the province of Naples and Salerno. In particular, the area includes the area to be evacuated in danger of invasion by pyroclastic flows (the red 1) and the area at high risk of collapse of the roofs of the buildings for the accumulation of volcanic ash and lapilli (red zone 2) . On 19 December 2012 the new scenario was presented to municipalities in the red zone in the Vesuvian area then be shared with the national operating structures, on 11 January 2013. during an operational Committee.
\nThe Working Group also has studied in-depth the ash fallout, using the results of several scientific works and projects, and has identified possible scenarios of reference for the definition of the yellow zone.
The attachment “Scenario and alert levels” published on 11 January 2013 has been substituted on 6 February 2013 with a easy-reading, in colour, with a new lay out document. The number of pages has been halved, because we mistakenly duplicated the document. We specify that the content is exactly the same of the old one.
\nTables and charts referred to in the document “Eruptive scenarios and alert levels” are not attached because they are too heavy. The Department can provide them to any institution upon request.
2012 – Alert levels for the new plan. The working group has decided to maintain the same level of alert in the Plan of 2001, which includes a basic level (green), a level of attention (yellow), a level of pre-alarm (orange) and a warning level (red), in accordance with the provisions of the most monitored volcanoes on our planet. The four levels of alert mark the time before a possible resumption of eruptive activity occurs. Currently, the alert level to Vesuvius is green, that is there has been no abnormal phenomenon than ordinary activity that has been characterizing the volcano for decades. The transition from one level of alert to the next corresponds to the variation of the parameters (seismicity, ground deformation, the composition of gases in fumaroles, etc..) routinely monitored, 24/7, by the monitoring system managed by the Vesuvius Observatory - Ingv and leads to a progressive increase in the probability of reactivation of the volcano eruption.
\nConsequently, it modulates the increasing response of the civil protection system, which culminates with the evacuation of the population present in the red zone (alarm level). The definition of specific preset thresholds, beyond which are activated \"automatically\" the various levels of warning, it is a complex and delicate operation. According to the findings of the Working Group for the transition from the basic level to the level of attention it is possible to establish a threshold, that is, a quantitative criterion based on overcoming the basic values of the monitored parameters: the variation of a parameter is considered significant when it exceeds the value ordinarily recorded (end value) of at least twice the value of its standard deviation (uncertainty associated with the figure). In particular, it is established that the transition to the level of attention occurs when at least two of the monitored parameters have recorded significant variations. If the change occurs only for a parameter that does not imply a change to the level of attention but activates a phase of exceptional surveillance for the entire surveillance system and the Central Functional Centre of the Department. For the higher levels of alert it is believed that the definition of predetermined thresholds involves a high probability of false and missed alarms, so the assessment should be based on an analysis of the parameters monitored in real time by experts.
2012/2013 - Training activites on volcanic risk in the Vesuvius area.The Department of Civil Protection, the Campania Region and the Vesuvius Observatory launched in late 2012 training courses on volcanic risk dedicated to municipalities, volunteers and operational structures of the Phlegraean and Vesuvius areas, and staff the Campania Region, the Prefecture and the Province of Naples. The course included two days lectures and two days dedicated to the visit of Phlegraean Fields, Vesuvius and the Vesuvius Observatory. All municipalities in the Phlegraean Fields - Bacoli, Giugliano in Campania, Marano, Pozzuoli, Quarto and Monte di Procida - have joined the initiative while in the Vesuvius area only twelve municipalities have participated in the training days: Ercolano, Massa di Somma, Nola, Poggiomarino, Pollena Trocchia, Pompei, Portici, Somma Vesuviana, Terzigno, Torre Annunziata, Torre del Greco and Pompei. About forty officials attended the edition dedicated to the staff of the Campania Region and the Municipality, Prefecture and the Province of Naples, while 30 voluntary organizations of the Vesuvius and the Phlegraean areas took part in the fourth training cycle. For 2013, there are additional editions of the updating emergency plans for the two volcanic areas.
\n2013/2014 – Definitive delimitation of the red zone and twinnings
\nIn order to define the new red zone, from the perspective of sharing and collaborating with every and each involved subject in the national planning, it has been agreed that, if the municipalities were able to manage partial evacuation of their own communities, they could have propose boundaries different from the administrative ones set up by the Department (see map New scenario Vesuvius(905 Kb)\"). To carry out such new boundaries, the Department imposed two conditions: that the proposed boundaries were not smaller than the ones defined by the “red zone 1”, that is the one subject to the invasion of pyroclasting flow; that the Municipalities with territories in the red zone 2 could demonstrate to have reinforces the roofing of vulnerable buildings exposed to the fall of pyroclastic deposits.
\nOnly a few municipalities made proposals that were accepted by the Regional Committee with the 26 July 2013 decision. The new red zone (436 Kb) was permanently approved on 14 February 2014 in the directive of the President of Council of Ministers, that received the approval of the Joint Conference on 6 February 2014.
\nIn the same directive, to guarantee assistance to the population in the red zone, the twinning to carry out between municipalities and Regions and Autonomous Provinces in case of precautionary evacuation has been redefined.
2014 – Training activities in the Vesuvius and Phlegrean Fields areas. At the end of the year , the Department of Civil Protection and INGV-National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology have started, with the collaboration of the Regional Education Office and the Campania Region, the EDURISK project in primary and secondary schools of the red areas of Vesuvius and Phlegrean Fields. It is a training for teachers which provides specific tools to support educational planning. Among the topics covered: hazard and assessment of seismic and seismic risks; psychology and behavior in contexts of volcanic risk; risk education. A part of the training is dedicated to the presentation of the National Service of Civil Protection and Emergency Planning for Volcanic Risk.
\n2015 – New yellow zone and addresses to operating components and structures for the red zone. On 9 February, the Campania Region has approved the resolution with new borders of the yellow zone. This area, outside the red zone, is exposed to a significant fallout of volcanic ash and pyroclastic materials that could cause the collapse of the roof. The resolution welcomes the definition given by the Civil Protection Department, based on indications of the scientific community, and in collaboration with the Campania Region. In the same resolution, were also supplied indications for the preparation of emergency plans to municipalities in the yellow zone and also to those outside of it but still affected, although to a lesser extent, from the fallout of volcanic ash that could result, locally, other consequences (such as the clogging of sewers, the difficulty of vehicle circulation, the interruption of power lines and communications).
\nIn addition, as required by the Directive of 14 February 2014, on 31 March 2015, the indications of the Head of Department have been published in the Official Gazette, in agreement with the Region of Campania and after consultation with the Joint Conference, addressed to the members and operating units in order to update within 4 months their emergency planning in relation to the red zone.
\n2016 - Publication of the resolution of the President of Council that officialises the yellow zone. On 19 January 2016 the directive of the President of the Council of Ministers which establishes the new yellow zone has been published on the Official Gazette, already approved on 9 February 2015 with directive of Campania Region. The Head of Department, in agreement with Campania Region, and the Joint Conference, provides to the components and operational structures of civil protection the indications for the update of the respective emergency plans, aiming at safeguarding the population in the yellow zone.
\n2016/2017 – Presentation of the Plan to evacuate people from the red zone. The Campania Region is developing - with the support of ACaMIR - Campania Agency for Mobility, Infrastructure and Networks and in close connection with the Department of Civil Protection and with the managers of infrastructural networks - a Plan to manage the removal of people to be evacuated in precautionary way from the 25 municipalities of the red zone. In summary, the Plan provides for the identification of \"gates\" for the exit from the red zone and the assisted transport of the population in \"meeting areas\", identified along the main escape routes. The general strategy of the phase of transfer of the evacuated population - which will take place by bus, train or ships - from the \"meeting areas\" to the \"first reception points\", set up in the regions and autonomous twinned provinces, has already been planned. To guarantee the homogeneity of the Red Zone population transfer plans in the different regions and autonomous autonomous provinces, a working table was set up by the Department, which was attended by the bodies and companies with competence in the management of national mobility. The meeting areas, together with the transfer procedures, have been formalized with the Campania Region Resolution n. 8 of 17 January 2017.
\n2017/2018 – Intervention model to activate in case of yellow, orange or red alert. In conjunction with the Campania Region, the Department of Civil Protection has developed a model of intervention to be activated in case of passage from the current state of equilibrium (green) to the levels of yellow, orange and red alert, with the consequent activation of the different operating phases (attention, pre-alarm and alarm). The model defines, in particular, the organization of the National Civil Protection Service for the execution of the operational activities necessary to manage any emergencies (from the activation of the Operational Committee, to the structuring of the Di.Coma.C and the operational and coordination on the territory). This document has already been shared with the components and operational structures of civil protection and, soon, will be formalized in a specific document that will define the details.
\n","value":"2003 - Reconstitution of the National Commission
\r\n2006 - Mesimex International Exercise on Mount Vesuvius
\r\n2007/2008 - Changes made to the Plan
\r\n2012 -The new scenario for the National Plan
\r\n2012 - Alert levels for the new plan
\r\n2012/2013 - Training activities on volcanic risk in the Vesuvius area
\r\n2013/2014 - Definitive delimitation of the red zone and twinnings
\r\n2014 - Training activities in the Vesuvius and Phlegrean Fields areas
\r\n2015 - New yellow zone and addresses to operating components and structures for the red zone
\r\n2016 - Publication of the resolution of the President of Council that officialises the yellow zone
\r\n2016/2017 - Presentation of the Plan to evacuate people from the red zone
\r\n2017/2018 – Intervention model to activate in case of yellow, orange or red alert
2003 - Reconstitution of the National Commission. The first National Emergency Plan for Vesuvius was drafted in 1995 by two national commissions, set up in 1991 and 1993, to assess the risk involved in the Vesuvius eruption and plan the response to any emergency. In 2001, the \"Additions and Variations\" in different sections of the Plan were approved. In 2002, a National Commission is reconstituted with the goal of having an ordinary instrument for the continuous updating of the planning and the Head of the Department of Civil Protection, by decree no.698 of 6 March 6 2003, he appoints the members. In particular, the Working Group made up of experts in volcanic risk is entrusted with the revision of the scenarios and levels of alert for a national emergency.
\r\n
\r\n2006 - Mesimex International Exercise on Mount Vesuvius. A first test of the activities carried out by the new Commission was organized in 2006, with the international exercise Mesimex - SIMulation Major Emergency Exercise - a volcanic eruption of Mount Vesuvius was simulated to test and improve emergency procedures, including 'evacuation of the inhabitants of the towns in the red zone. The Civil Protection Department coordinated the exercise that involved four EU member states - France, Spain, Portugal and Sweden, testing their ability to respond within the European Civil Protection Mechanism. In particular, during the exercise, the viability plan for the Vesuvius area has been tested. The plan was prepared in 2006 by the Civil Protection Department, in collaboration with Hydraulics Traffic and Transport Department of La Sapienza University of Rome, which set out the main evacuation routes from towns in the red zone in case of eruption.
\r\n
\r\n2007/2008 – Changes made to the Plan. Following the exercise, some changes to the National Plan of emergency for the area of Vesuvius were introduced in 2001, shared at a meeting of 23 April 2007 by the Civil Protection Department, Vesuvius Observatory Ingv Region Campania, Prefecture - Utg and the Province of Naples. The changes introduced were not made official in the updated document because in 2006 it was already in the activities of the group, responsible for defining the new scenario, which would have formed the basis for a comprehensive review of the Plan. In particular, during the meeting the following were confirmed: a sub-Plinian eruption as a reference event, the definition of red zone established in 2001, the three levels of warning before an eruption - attention, pre-alarm, alarm. On the other hand, the need to redefine the yellow area, i.e. the area subject to the fallout of ashes and lapilli, and the blue area, potentially subject to flooding and flooding, as well as to the fallout of ashes and lapilli, was highlighted. With regard to the operational measures envisaged in the Plan, twinning was confirmed between Vesuvian municipalities and Italian regions for the hospitality of the evacuated population. Evacuation of health care facilities and launching initiatives to safeguard the cultural heritage are now again considered part of the pre-alarm phase, whereas the alarm phase includes the evacuation of the red zone within 72 hours and no more than 7 days, as provided in the Plan of 2001. What emerged was the importance of redefining how the evacuation of the population would be carried out, according to the measurements in the Traffic Plan. In particular, the evacuation has been organized in two phases: the first one provides for the displacement of the population in areas of first aid immediately outside the area at risk (red and yellow zones), and a second one which provides for the transfer in the twinned regions . The means chosen for evacuation are road transport, and other means (trains and ships) are kept as a strategic reserve.
\r\n
\r\n(The Traffic Plan and its attachments are available in the annex, whereas the tables relating to the Plan are not published because the files are too heavy for the website. However, they can be obtained from the Department.)
\r\n
\r\nAt the same meeting, lines under the responsibility of various local administrations involved were also defined, with particular reference to the population census and reception facilities and evacuation plans in detail. After the meeting, Department, Region,
\r\nPrefecture - Utg and the Province of Naple organized various meetings with municipal technicians in the red zone to agree on the plan for general traffic, accepting any additions and amendments proposed by local governments, where possible.
\r\n
\r\n2012 – The new scenario for the National Plan. On 26 April 2012 the Department has received from the working group of the National Commission for the emergency plan a document regarding new scenarios and alert levels, on the basis of which the different risk zones and their operational strategies will be redefined. The document of the scenarios was submitted on 27 June 2012 for the assessment of the National Major Risks Commission - Sector Volcanic Risk that was found consistent with the most recent studies on the topic. From this moment on, the Department has initiated a series of discussions with the Campania Region to collect the information necessary for redefining the red zone, which now includes the territories of 25 municipalities in the province of Naples and Salerno. In particular, the area includes the area to be evacuated in danger of invasion by pyroclastic flows (the red 1) and the area at high risk of collapse of the roofs of the buildings for the accumulation of volcanic ash and lapilli (red zone 2) . On 19 December 2012 the new scenario was presented to municipalities in the red zone in the Vesuvian area then be shared with the national operating structures, on 11 January 2013. during an operational Committee.
\r\nThe Working Group also has studied in-depth the ash fallout, using the results of several scientific works and projects, and has identified possible scenarios of reference for the definition of the yellow zone.
The attachment “Scenario and alert levels” published on 11 January 2013 has been substituted on 6 February 2013 with a easy-reading, in colour, with a new lay out document. The number of pages has been halved, because we mistakenly duplicated the document. We specify that the content is exactly the same of the old one.
\r\nTables and charts referred to in the document “Eruptive scenarios and alert levels” are not attached because they are too heavy. The Department can provide them to any institution upon request.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n2012 – Alert levels for the new plan. The working group has decided to maintain the same level of alert in the Plan of 2001, which includes a basic level (green), a level of attention (yellow), a level of pre-alarm (orange) and a warning level (red), in accordance with the provisions of the most monitored volcanoes on our planet. The four levels of alert mark the time before a possible resumption of eruptive activity occurs. Currently, the alert level to Vesuvius is green, that is there has been no abnormal phenomenon than ordinary activity that has been characterizing the volcano for decades. The transition from one level of alert to the next corresponds to the variation of the parameters (seismicity, ground deformation, the composition of gases in fumaroles, etc..) routinely monitored, 24/7, by the monitoring system managed by the Vesuvius Observatory - Ingv and leads to a progressive increase in the probability of reactivation of the volcano eruption.
\r\nConsequently, it modulates the increasing response of the civil protection system, which culminates with the evacuation of the population present in the red zone (alarm level). The definition of specific preset thresholds, beyond which are activated \"automatically\" the various levels of warning, it is a complex and delicate operation. According to the findings of the Working Group for the transition from the basic level to the level of attention it is possible to establish a threshold, that is, a quantitative criterion based on overcoming the basic values of the monitored parameters: the variation of a parameter is considered significant when it exceeds the value ordinarily recorded (end value) of at least twice the value of its standard deviation (uncertainty associated with the figure). In particular, it is established that the transition to the level of attention occurs when at least two of the monitored parameters have recorded significant variations. If the change occurs only for a parameter that does not imply a change to the level of attention but activates a phase of exceptional surveillance for the entire surveillance system and the Central Functional Centre of the Department. For the higher levels of alert it is believed that the definition of predetermined thresholds involves a high probability of false and missed alarms, so the assessment should be based on an analysis of the parameters monitored in real time by experts.
2012/2013 - Training activites on volcanic risk in the Vesuvius area.The Department of Civil Protection, the Campania Region and the Vesuvius Observatory launched in late 2012 training courses on volcanic risk dedicated to municipalities, volunteers and operational structures of the Phlegraean and Vesuvius areas, and staff the Campania Region, the Prefecture and the Province of Naples. The course included two days lectures and two days dedicated to the visit of Phlegraean Fields, Vesuvius and the Vesuvius Observatory. All municipalities in the Phlegraean Fields - Bacoli, Giugliano in Campania, Marano, Pozzuoli, Quarto and Monte di Procida - have joined the initiative while in the Vesuvius area only twelve municipalities have participated in the training days: Ercolano, Massa di Somma, Nola, Poggiomarino, Pollena Trocchia, Pompei, Portici, Somma Vesuviana, Terzigno, Torre Annunziata, Torre del Greco and Pompei. About forty officials attended the edition dedicated to the staff of the Campania Region and the Municipality, Prefecture and the Province of Naples, while 30 voluntary organizations of the Vesuvius and the Phlegraean areas took part in the fourth training cycle. For 2013, there are additional editions of the updating emergency plans for the two volcanic areas.
\r\n\r\n2013/2014 – Definitive delimitation of the red zone and twinnings
\r\nIn order to define the new red zone, from the perspective of sharing and collaborating with every and each involved subject in the national planning, it has been agreed that, if the municipalities were able to manage partial evacuation of their own communities, they could have propose boundaries different from the administrative ones set up by the Department (see map New scenario Vesuvius(905 Kb)\"). To carry out such new boundaries, the Department imposed two conditions: that the proposed boundaries were not smaller than the ones defined by the “red zone 1”, that is the one subject to the invasion of pyroclasting flow; that the Municipalities with territories in the red zone 2 could demonstrate to have reinforces the roofing of vulnerable buildings exposed to the fall of pyroclastic deposits.
\r\nOnly a few municipalities made proposals that were accepted by the Regional Committee with the 26 July 2013 decision. The new red zone (436 Kb) was permanently approved on 14 February 2014 in the directive of the President of Council of Ministers, that received the approval of the Joint Conference on 6 February 2014.
\r\nIn the same directive, to guarantee assistance to the population in the red zone, the twinning to carry out between municipalities and Regions and Autonomous Provinces in case of precautionary evacuation has been redefined.
2014 – Training activities in the Vesuvius and Phlegrean Fields areas. At the end of the year , the Department of Civil Protection and INGV-National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology have started, with the collaboration of the Regional Education Office and the Campania Region, the EDURISK project in primary and secondary schools of the red areas of Vesuvius and Phlegrean Fields. It is a training for teachers which provides specific tools to support educational planning. Among the topics covered: hazard and assessment of seismic and seismic risks; psychology and behavior in contexts of volcanic risk; risk education. A part of the training is dedicated to the presentation of the National Service of Civil Protection and Emergency Planning for Volcanic Risk.
\r\n\r\n2015 – New yellow zone and addresses to operating components and structures for the red zone. On 9 February, the Campania Region has approved the resolution with new borders of the yellow zone. This area, outside the red zone, is exposed to a significant fallout of volcanic ash and pyroclastic materials that could cause the collapse of the roof. The resolution welcomes the definition given by the Civil Protection Department, based on indications of the scientific community, and in collaboration with the Campania Region. In the same resolution, were also supplied indications for the preparation of emergency plans to municipalities in the yellow zone and also to those outside of it but still affected, although to a lesser extent, from the fallout of volcanic ash that could result, locally, other consequences (such as the clogging of sewers, the difficulty of vehicle circulation, the interruption of power lines and communications).
\r\n
\r\nIn addition, as required by the Directive of 14 February 2014, on 31 March 2015, the indications of the Head of Department have been published in the Official Gazette, in agreement with the Region of Campania and after consultation with the Joint Conference, addressed to the members and operating units in order to update within 4 months their emergency planning in relation to the red zone.
2016 - Publication of the resolution of the President of Council that officialises the yellow zone. On 19 January 2016 the directive of the President of the Council of Ministers which establishes the new yellow zone has been published on the Official Gazette, already approved on 9 February 2015 with directive of Campania Region. The Head of Department, in agreement with Campania Region, and the Joint Conference, provides to the components and operational structures of civil protection the indications for the update of the respective emergency plans, aiming at safeguarding the population in the yellow zone.
\r\n\r\n2016/2017 – Presentation of the Plan to evacuate people from the red zone. The Campania Region is developing - with the support of ACaMIR - Campania Agency for Mobility, Infrastructure and Networks and in close connection with the Department of Civil Protection and with the managers of infrastructural networks - a Plan to manage the removal of people to be evacuated in precautionary way from the 25 municipalities of the red zone. In summary, the Plan provides for the identification of \"gates\" for the exit from the red zone and the assisted transport of the population in \"meeting areas\", identified along the main escape routes. The general strategy of the phase of transfer of the evacuated population - which will take place by bus, train or ships - from the \"meeting areas\" to the \"first reception points\", set up in the regions and autonomous twinned provinces, has already been planned. To guarantee the homogeneity of the Red Zone population transfer plans in the different regions and autonomous autonomous provinces, a working table was set up by the Department, which was attended by the bodies and companies with competence in the management of national mobility. The meeting areas, together with the transfer procedures, have been formalized with the Campania Region Resolution n. 8 of 17 January 2017.
\r\n\r\n2017/2018 – Intervention model to activate in case of yellow, orange or red alert. In conjunction with the Campania Region, the Department of Civil Protection has developed a model of intervention to be activated in case of passage from the current state of equilibrium (green) to the levels of yellow, orange and red alert, with the consequent activation of the different operating phases (attention, pre-alarm and alarm). The model defines, in particular, the organization of the National Civil Protection Service for the execution of the operational activities necessary to manage any emergencies (from the activation of the Operational Committee, to the structuring of the Di.Coma.C and the operational and coordination on the territory). This document has already been shared with the components and operational structures of civil protection and, soon, will be formalized in a specific document that will define the details.
\r\n"},"relationships":{"field_immagine":null,"field_video":null,"field_link_interni":[]},"drupal_internal__id":17893}],"field_tab":[],"field_immagine_dettaglio":null,"field_immagine_anteprima":null,"field_galleria_flickr":null,"field_galleria_foto":null,"field_galleria_video":null,"field_allegati":[{"title":"Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":436039,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/51e4c72c7acb834ecd43ce4825ebae01/Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf"}}},{"title":"Mappa_gemellaggi_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"Mappa_gemellaggi_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":242622,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/39e2d0a6e55927dc2fbbde7af6c1e130/Mappa_gemellaggi_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"Mappa_gemellaggi_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf"}}},{"title":"mappa_zona_gialla.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"mappa_zona_gialla.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":1694739,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/b3232037200a6ead777cb01bb2461714/mappa_zona_gialla.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"mappa_zona_gialla.pdf"}}},{"title":"20150120_indicazioni_zona_rossa_CU.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"20150120_indicazioni_zona_rossa_CU.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":664164,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/de533707b3b12563ec51e3619b2befa0/20150120_indicazioni_zona_rossa_CU.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"20150120_indicazioni_zona_rossa_CU.pdf"}}},{"title":"delibera_giunta_campania_8_17gennaio2017.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"delibera_giunta_campania_8_17gennaio2017.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":3911451,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/6771cbe662a1a3928f24be526c5b9b1f/delibera_giunta_campania_8_17gennaio2017.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"delibera_giunta_campania_8_17gennaio2017.pdf"}}},{"title":"Mappe_Vesuvio_rev.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"Mappe_Vesuvio_rev.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":905950,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/f6a75fb60fa4a079a0ecec35dd874d15/Mappe_Vesuvio_rev.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"Mappe_Vesuvio_rev.pdf"}}},{"title":"Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","field_titolo_esteso":"Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":436039,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/51e4c72c7acb834ecd43ce4825ebae01/Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf","extension":"pdf"},"filename":"Nuova_zona_rossa_Direttiva_Vesuvio_14feb2014.pdf"}}},{"title":"Dati vettoriali Mappe zone rossa e gialla pianificazione Vesuvio","field_titolo_esteso":"Dati vettoriali Mappe zone rossa e gialla pianificazione Vesuvio","relationships":{"field_allegato":{"filesize":505999,"localFile":{"publicURL":"/static/9ded516809c2336a23bd89dcd4aff64d/zone-pianificazione-vesuvio.zip","extension":"zip"},"filename":"zone-pianificazione-vesuvio.zip"}}}],"field_correlazioni":[],"field_normative":[{"title":"Direttiva del 14 febbraio 2014","field_titolo_esteso":"Direttiva del 14 febbraio 2014: disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio","body":{"processed":"Pubblicata nella Gazzetta Ufficiale n.108 del 12 maggio 2014
\nIL PRESIDENTE DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI
\nVISTA la legge 24 febbraio 1992, n. 225 recante: \"Istituzione del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile\" e successive modificazioni;
\nVISTO il decreto legislativo 31 marzo 1998, n. 112, recante: \"Conferimento di funzioni e compili amministrativi dello Stato alle regioni ed agli enti locali, in attuazione del capo I della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 5\" ed in particolare gli articoli 107 e 108;
\nVISTO il decreto-legge 7 settembre 2001 , n. 343, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 9 novembre 2001, n. 401, recante: \"Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare il coordinamento operativo delle strutture preposte alle attività di protezione civile e per migliorare le strutture logistiche nel settore della difesa civile\";
\nVISTI, in particolare, il comma 2 dell'articolo 5 del sopra citato decreto-legge n. 343/2001, ave è previsto che il Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri predisponga gli indirizzi operativi dei programmi di previsione e prevenzione dei rischi, nonché i programmi nazionali di soccorso e i piani per l'attuazione delle conseguenti misure di emergenza, nonché il comma 5 del medesimo articolo 5 ave è previsto che il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile rivolga alle amministrazioni centrali e periferiche dello Stato, delle Regioni, delle Province, dei Comuni, degli Enti pubblici nazionali e territoriale e di ogni altra istituzione ed organizzazione pubblica e privata presente nel territorio nazionale, le indicazioni necessarie al raggiungimento delle predette finalità;
\nVISTA la Direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 3 dicembre 2008 concernente: \"Indirizzi operativi per la gestione delle emergenze\";
\nVISTO il decreto-legge 15 maggio 2012, n. 59, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge del 12 luglio 2012, n. 100, recante: \"Disposizioni urgenti per il riordino della protezione civile\";
\nVISTO il decreto-legge 14 agosto 2013, n. 93 convertilo con modificazioni dalla legge 15 ottobre 2013, n. 119, recante: \"Disposizioni urgenti in materia di sicurezza e per il contrasto della violenza di genere, nonché in tema di protezione civile e di commissariamento delle province.\" e, in particolare, l'articolo 10;
\nVISTO il decreto del 9 agosto 1993, n. 516, con cui il Sottosegretario di Stato alla protezione civile pro-tempore, ha istituito una Commissione incaricata di provvedere alla elaborazione di un piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana connessa a situazioni derivanti dal rischio vulcanico;
\nVISTO il rapporto finale di detta Commissione approvato il 25 settembre 1995, concernente il Piano Nazionale di emergenza dell'area vesuviana;
\nVISTO il decreto del Ministro dell'interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 247 dell'l febbraio 1996, di costituzione della Commissione incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento del richiamato Piano di emergenza;
\nVISTO il documento recante: \"Aggiunte e varianti alle parti A3, B, Cl e C2 della pianificazione nazionale d'emergenza dell'area vesuviana\" approvato dalla predetta Commissione nella riunione del20 marzo 2001;
\nVISTO il decreto del Ministro dell'Interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 1828 del 18 giugno 2002 di ricostituzione della Commissione nazionale incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento dei piani di emergenza dell'area vesuviana e dell'area flegrea per il rischio vulcanico;
\nVISTO il decreto del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile di rep. n. 698, del 6 marzo 2003 di nomina dei membri costituenti la suddetta Commissione;
\nCONSIDERATO che alla Commissione da ultimo citata è stato attribuito il compito, tra gli altri, di predisporre un apposito Documento per la revisione degli scenari e dei livelli di allerta per il piano nazionale d'emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio;
\nVISTA la nota prot. 26375 del 13 aprile 2012, con cui la predetta Commissione ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile il Documento \"Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio\" contenente, tra l'altro, l'indicazione delle aree ad alta probabilità di invasione di flussi piroclastici e ad elevato rischio di crolli delle coperture degli edifici per accumuli di depositi di materiale piroclastico;
\nCONSIDERATO che il predetto documento è stato sottoposto al parere della Commissione nazionale per la previsione e la prevenzione dei grandi rischi – settore rischio vulcanico che, riunitasi in data 12 ottobre 2012, si è espressa, in particolare, sulla delimitazione dell'area di possibile invasione di flussi piroclastici;
\nTENUTO CONTO che il Dipartimento della protezione civile e la Regione Campania, sulla base del Documento contenente \"Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio\" e delle valutazioni della Commissione per la previsione e la prevenzione dei grandi rischi - Settore rischio vulcanico, hanno avviato le attività di competenza volte alla revisione del Piano nazionale d'emergenza e alla ridefinizione dei confini della \"Zona rossa\" del medesimo Piano, intesa come l'area da evacuare cautelativamente per salvaguardare le vite umane dagli effetti di una possibile eruzione in quanto ad alta probabilità di invasione di flussi piroclastici e elevato rischio di crolli delle coperture degli edifici per accumuli di depositi di materiale piroclastico;
\nCONSIDERATO che, in data 19 dicembre 2012, il Dipartimento della protezione civile congiuntamente alla Regione Campania ed all'Osservatorio Vesuviano dell'Istituto nazionale di geofisica e vulcanologia, ha presentato ai Comuni interessati il nuovo scenario di rischio, relativo all'area esposta al pericolo di invasione da flussi piroclastici e all'area ad elevato rischio di collassi delle coperture degli edifici per l'accumulo di ceneri vulcaniche e lapilli, nonché l'ipotesi di delimitazione della Zona rossa ai fini dell'aggiornamento della pianificazione nazionale di emergenza, alla presenza dei rappresentanti della Prefettura di Napoli e della Provincia di Napoli;
\nCONSIDERATO inoltre che, in data 11 gennaio 2013, nell'ambito di una riunione del Comitato operativo della protezione civile sul \"Rischio vulcanico in Regione Campania - Aggiornamenti sulla pianificazione d'emergenza al Vesuvio e sulla variazione di fase operativa ai Campi Flegrei\", il predetto scenario e l'ipotesi di delimitazione della zona rossa sono stati condivisi con le componenti e le strutture operative del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile;
\nVISTI gli esiti delle interlocuzioni effettuate dalla Regione Campania con i comuni interessati, relativamente alla delimitazione della Zona rossa all'interno dei territori di competenza, trasmessi al Dipartimento della protezione civile in data 29 marzo 2013;
\nVISTA la delibera della Giunta Regionale n, 250 del 26 luglio 2013, concernente la \"Delimitazione della zona rossa 1 e della zona rossa 2 del piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana, Presa d'atto delle proposte comunali\";
\nVISTI gli esiti della seduta dell'11 luglio 2013 della Commissione speciale protezione civile delle Regioni e delle Province autonome in seduta congiunta con il Dipartimento della protezione civile, in cui è stato approvato il metodo per il gemellaggio e l'abbinamento tra i Comuni della Zona rossa e le Regioni e Province autonome ai fini della distribuzione territoriale della popolazione vesuviana in caso di evacuazione;
\nRAVVISATA, pertanto la necessità di impartire indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza a seguito della ridefinizione della 'Zona rossa' e dell'approvazione del citato metodo per il gemellaggi io e l'abbinamento tra i Comuni della Zona rossa e le Regioni e Province autonome;
\nVISTA l'istruttoria tecnica effettuata dal Dipartimento della protezione civile della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri;
\nACQUISITA l'intesa della Conferenza unificata in data 6 febbraio 2014;
\nADOTTA LE SEGUENTI DISPOSIZIONI PER L'AGGIORNAMENTO DELLA PIANIFICAZIONE DI EMERGENZA PER IL RISCHIO VULCANICO DEL VESUVIO
\n\nIl presente provvedimento ed i relativi allegati saranno inviati ai competenti organi di controllo e pubblicati sulla Gazzetta ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana.
\nRoma, 14 febbraio 2014
\nIl Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri Letta
Pubblicata nella Gazzetta Ufficiale n.108 del 12 maggio 2014
\r\n\r\nIL PRESIDENTE DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI
\r\n
\r\nVISTA la legge 24 febbraio 1992, n. 225 recante: \"Istituzione del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile\" e successive modificazioni;
VISTO il decreto legislativo 31 marzo 1998, n. 112, recante: \"Conferimento di funzioni e compili amministrativi dello Stato alle regioni ed agli enti locali, in attuazione del capo I della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 5\" ed in particolare gli articoli 107 e 108;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto-legge 7 settembre 2001 , n. 343, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 9 novembre 2001, n. 401, recante: \"Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare il coordinamento operativo delle strutture preposte alle attività di protezione civile e per migliorare le strutture logistiche nel settore della difesa civile\";
\r\n\r\nVISTI, in particolare, il comma 2 dell'articolo 5 del sopra citato decreto-legge n. 343/2001, ave è previsto che il Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri predisponga gli indirizzi operativi dei programmi di previsione e prevenzione dei rischi, nonché i programmi nazionali di soccorso e i piani per l'attuazione delle conseguenti misure di emergenza, nonché il comma 5 del medesimo articolo 5 ave è previsto che il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile rivolga alle amministrazioni centrali e periferiche dello Stato, delle Regioni, delle Province, dei Comuni, degli Enti pubblici nazionali e territoriale e di ogni altra istituzione ed organizzazione pubblica e privata presente nel territorio nazionale, le indicazioni necessarie al raggiungimento delle predette finalità;
\r\n\r\nVISTA la Direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 3 dicembre 2008 concernente: \"Indirizzi operativi per la gestione delle emergenze\";
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto-legge 15 maggio 2012, n. 59, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge del 12 luglio 2012, n. 100, recante: \"Disposizioni urgenti per il riordino della protezione civile\";
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto-legge 14 agosto 2013, n. 93 convertilo con modificazioni dalla legge 15 ottobre 2013, n. 119, recante: \"Disposizioni urgenti in materia di sicurezza e per il contrasto della violenza di genere, nonché in tema di protezione civile e di commissariamento delle province.\" e, in particolare, l'articolo 10;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto del 9 agosto 1993, n. 516, con cui il Sottosegretario di Stato alla protezione civile pro-tempore, ha istituito una Commissione incaricata di provvedere alla elaborazione di un piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana connessa a situazioni derivanti dal rischio vulcanico;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il rapporto finale di detta Commissione approvato il 25 settembre 1995, concernente il Piano Nazionale di emergenza dell'area vesuviana;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto del Ministro dell'interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 247 dell'l febbraio 1996, di costituzione della Commissione incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento del richiamato Piano di emergenza;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il documento recante: \"Aggiunte e varianti alle parti A3, B, Cl e C2 della pianificazione nazionale d'emergenza dell'area vesuviana\" approvato dalla predetta Commissione nella riunione del20 marzo 2001;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto del Ministro dell'Interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 1828 del 18 giugno 2002 di ricostituzione della Commissione nazionale incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento dei piani di emergenza dell'area vesuviana e dell'area flegrea per il rischio vulcanico;
\r\n\r\nVISTO il decreto del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile di rep. n. 698, del 6 marzo 2003 di nomina dei membri costituenti la suddetta Commissione;
\r\n\r\nCONSIDERATO che alla Commissione da ultimo citata è stato attribuito il compito, tra gli altri, di predisporre un apposito Documento per la revisione degli scenari e dei livelli di allerta per il piano nazionale d'emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio;
\r\n\r\nVISTA la nota prot. 26375 del 13 aprile 2012, con cui la predetta Commissione ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile il Documento \"Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio\" contenente, tra l'altro, l'indicazione delle aree ad alta probabilità di invasione di flussi piroclastici e ad elevato rischio di crolli delle coperture degli edifici per accumuli di depositi di materiale piroclastico;
\r\n\r\nCONSIDERATO che il predetto documento è stato sottoposto al parere della Commissione nazionale per la previsione e la prevenzione dei grandi rischi – settore rischio vulcanico che, riunitasi in data 12 ottobre 2012, si è espressa, in particolare, sulla delimitazione dell'area di possibile invasione di flussi piroclastici;
\r\n\r\nTENUTO CONTO che il Dipartimento della protezione civile e la Regione Campania, sulla base del Documento contenente \"Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio\" e delle valutazioni della Commissione per la previsione e la prevenzione dei grandi rischi - Settore rischio vulcanico, hanno avviato le attività di competenza volte alla revisione del Piano nazionale d'emergenza e alla ridefinizione dei confini della \"Zona rossa\" del medesimo Piano, intesa come l'area da evacuare cautelativamente per salvaguardare le vite umane dagli effetti di una possibile eruzione in quanto ad alta probabilità di invasione di flussi piroclastici e elevato rischio di crolli delle coperture degli edifici per accumuli di depositi di materiale piroclastico;
\r\n\r\nCONSIDERATO che, in data 19 dicembre 2012, il Dipartimento della protezione civile congiuntamente alla Regione Campania ed all'Osservatorio Vesuviano dell'Istituto nazionale di geofisica e vulcanologia, ha presentato ai Comuni interessati il nuovo scenario di rischio, relativo all'area esposta al pericolo di invasione da flussi piroclastici e all'area ad elevato rischio di collassi delle coperture degli edifici per l'accumulo di ceneri vulcaniche e lapilli, nonché l'ipotesi di delimitazione della Zona rossa ai fini dell'aggiornamento della pianificazione nazionale di emergenza, alla presenza dei rappresentanti della Prefettura di Napoli e della Provincia di Napoli;
\r\n\r\nCONSIDERATO inoltre che, in data 11 gennaio 2013, nell'ambito di una riunione del Comitato operativo della protezione civile sul \"Rischio vulcanico in Regione Campania - Aggiornamenti sulla pianificazione d'emergenza al Vesuvio e sulla variazione di fase operativa ai Campi Flegrei\", il predetto scenario e l'ipotesi di delimitazione della zona rossa sono stati condivisi con le componenti e le strutture operative del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile;
\r\n\r\nVISTI gli esiti delle interlocuzioni effettuate dalla Regione Campania con i comuni interessati, relativamente alla delimitazione della Zona rossa all'interno dei territori di competenza, trasmessi al Dipartimento della protezione civile in data 29 marzo 2013;
\r\n\r\nVISTA la delibera della Giunta Regionale n, 250 del 26 luglio 2013, concernente la \"Delimitazione della zona rossa 1 e della zona rossa 2 del piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana, Presa d'atto delle proposte comunali\";
\r\n\r\nVISTI gli esiti della seduta dell'11 luglio 2013 della Commissione speciale protezione civile delle Regioni e delle Province autonome in seduta congiunta con il Dipartimento della protezione civile, in cui è stato approvato il metodo per il gemellaggio e l'abbinamento tra i Comuni della Zona rossa e le Regioni e Province autonome ai fini della distribuzione territoriale della popolazione vesuviana in caso di evacuazione;
\r\n\r\nRAVVISATA, pertanto la necessità di impartire indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza a seguito della ridefinizione della 'Zona rossa' e dell'approvazione del citato metodo per il gemellaggi io e l'abbinamento tra i Comuni della Zona rossa e le Regioni e Province autonome;
\r\n\r\nVISTA l'istruttoria tecnica effettuata dal Dipartimento della protezione civile della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri;
\r\n
\r\nACQUISITA l'intesa della Conferenza unificata in data 6 febbraio 2014;
ADOTTA LE SEGUENTI DISPOSIZIONI PER L'AGGIORNAMENTO DELLA PIANIFICAZIONE DI EMERGENZA PER IL RISCHIO VULCANICO DEL VESUVIO
\r\n\r\n
\r\nIl presente provvedimento ed i relativi allegati saranno inviati ai competenti organi di controllo e pubblicati sulla Gazzetta ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana.
Roma, 14 febbraio 2014
\r\nIl Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri Letta
Pubblicato nella Gazzetta Ufficiale n.75 del 31 marzo 2015
\nIl Capo del Dipartimento
\nVista la legge 24 febbraio 1992, n. 225 recante: “Istituzione del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile” e successive modificazioni;
\nVisto il decreto legislativo 31 marzo 1998, n. 112, recante: “Conferimento di funzioni e compiti amministrativi dello Stato alle regioni ed agli enti locali, in attuazione del Capo I della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 59” ed in particolare gli articoli 107 e 108;
\nVisto il decreto-legge 7 settembre 2001, n. 343, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 9 novembre 2001, n. 401, recante: “Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare il coordinamento operativo delle strutture preposte alle attività di protezione civile e per migliorare le strutture logistiche nel settore della difesa civile” ed in particolare:
\nVista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 3 dicembre 2008, recante: “Indirizzi operativi per la gestione delle emergenze”;
\nVista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 14 febbraio 2014 recante “Disposizioni per l’aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio”,
\nRavvisata, pertanto, la necessità di dare attuazione al punto 3 della direttiva del 14 febbraio u.s. di cui sopra, ove è previsto che il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile impartisca, alle Componenti ed alle Strutture operative del Servizio Nazionale della protezione civile, indicazioni per l’aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza ai fini dell’evacuazione cautelativa della popolazione della “Zona Rossa” dell’area vesuviana;
\nAcquisita l’intesa della regione Campania;
\nAcquisito il parere della Conferenza Unificata in data 22 gennaio 2015;
\nDecreta
\nArticolo 1
\nArticolo 2
\nIl presente provvedimento ed il relativo allegato saranno inviati ai competenti organi di controllo e pubblicati sulla Gazzetta ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana.
\nRoma, 2 febbraio 2015
\nIl Capo del Dipartimento
\nFranco Gabrielli
Pubblicato nella Gazzetta Ufficiale n.75 del 31 marzo 2015
\r\n\r\nIl Capo del Dipartimento
\r\n\r\nVista la legge 24 febbraio 1992, n. 225 recante: “Istituzione del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile” e successive modificazioni;
\r\n\r\nVisto il decreto legislativo 31 marzo 1998, n. 112, recante: “Conferimento di funzioni e compiti amministrativi dello Stato alle regioni ed agli enti locali, in attuazione del Capo I della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 59” ed in particolare gli articoli 107 e 108;
\r\n\r\nVisto il decreto-legge 7 settembre 2001, n. 343, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 9 novembre 2001, n. 401, recante: “Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare il coordinamento operativo delle strutture preposte alle attività di protezione civile e per migliorare le strutture logistiche nel settore della difesa civile” ed in particolare:
\r\n\r\nVista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 3 dicembre 2008, recante: “Indirizzi operativi per la gestione delle emergenze”;
\r\n\r\nVista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 14 febbraio 2014 recante “Disposizioni per l’aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio”,
\r\n\r\nRavvisata, pertanto, la necessità di dare attuazione al punto 3 della direttiva del 14 febbraio u.s. di cui sopra, ove è previsto che il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile impartisca, alle Componenti ed alle Strutture operative del Servizio Nazionale della protezione civile, indicazioni per l’aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza ai fini dell’evacuazione cautelativa della popolazione della “Zona Rossa” dell’area vesuviana;
\r\n\r\nAcquisita l’intesa della regione Campania;
\r\n\r\nAcquisito il parere della Conferenza Unificata in data 22 gennaio 2015;
\r\n\r\nDecreta
\r\n\r\nArticolo 1
\r\n\r\n
\r\nArticolo 2
Il presente provvedimento ed il relativo allegato saranno inviati ai competenti organi di controllo e pubblicati sulla Gazzetta ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana.
\r\n\r\nRoma, 2 febbraio 2015
\r\n\r\nIl Capo del Dipartimento
\r\nFranco Gabrielli
Disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio per le aree soggette a ricaduta di materiale piroclastico - Zona gialla
\nIl Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri
\n Vista la legge 24 febbraio 1992, n. 225 recante: «Istituzione del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile» e successive modificazioni e integrazioni;
Visto il decreto legislativo 31 marzo 1998, n. 112, recante: «Conferimento di funzioni e compiti amministrativi dello Stato alle regioni ed agli enti locali, in attuazione del Capo I della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 59» ed in particolare gli articoli 107 e 108;
Visto il decreto-legge 7 settembre 2001, n. 343, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 9 novembre 2001, n. 401, recante: «Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare il coordinamento operativo delle strutture preposte alle attivita' di protezione civile e per migliorare le strutture logistiche nel settore della difesa civile» ed in particolare: il comma 2 dell'art. 5, ove e' previsto che il Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri predisponga gli indirizzi operativi dei programmi di previsione e prevenzione dei rischi, nonche' i programmi nazionali di soccorso e i piani per l'attuazione delle conseguenti misure di emergenza; il comma 5 del medesimo art. 5 ove e' previsto che il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile rivolga alle amministrazioni centrali e periferiche dello Stato, delle regioni, delle province, dei comuni, degli enti pubblici nazionali e territoriali e di ogni altra istituzione ed organizzazione pubblica e privata presente nel territorio nazionale, le indicazioni necessarie al raggiungimento delle predette finalita';
Visto il decreto-legge 15 maggio 2012, n. 59, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge del 12 luglio 2012, n. 100, recante: «Disposizioni urgenti per il riordino della protezione civile»;
Visto il decreto-legge 14 agosto 2013, n. 93 convertito con modificazioni dalla legge 15 ottobre 2013, n. 119, recante: «Disposizioni urgenti in materia di sicurezza e per il contrasto della violenza di genere, nonche' in tema di protezione civile e di commissariamento delle province» e, in particolare, l'art. 10;
Vista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri 3 dicembre 2008, recante: «Indirizzi operativi per la gestione delle emergenze»;
Vista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri 14 febbraio 2014, recante «Disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio», con la quale viene definita la Zona rossa della pianificazione di emergenza nazionale per rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio e la relativa strategia di salvaguardia della popolazione a rischio tramite gemellaggi con le regioni e le province autonome italiane;
Visto il decreto 9 agosto 1993, n. 516, con cui il Sottosegretario di Stato alla protezione civile pro-tempore, ha istituito una Commissione incaricata di provvedere alla elaborazione di un piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana connessa a situazioni derivanti dal rischio vulcanico;
Visto il rapporto finale di detta Commissione approvato il 25 settembre 1995, concernente il Piano nazionale di emergenza dell'area vesuviana;
Visto il decreto del Ministro dell'interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 247 del 1° febbraio 1996, di costituzione della Commissione incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento del richiamato Piano di emergenza;
Visto il documento recante: «Aggiunte e varianti alle parti A3, B, C1 e C2 della pianificazione nazionale d'emergenza dell'area vesuviana» approvato dalla predetta Commissione nella riunione del 20 marzo 2001;
Visto il decreto del Ministro dell'interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 1828 del 18 giugno 2002 di ricostituzione della Commissione nazionale incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento dei piani di emergenza dell'area vesuviana e dell'area flegrea per il rischio vulcanico;
Visto il decreto del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile di rep. n. 698, del 6 marzo 2003 di nomina dei membri costituenti la suddetta Commissione;
Visto il decreto del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile 2 febbraio 2015, recante: «Indicazioni, alle Componenti ed alle Strutture operative del Servizio nazionale di protezione civile, inerenti l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza ai fini dell'evacuazione cautelativa della popolazione della Zona rossa dell'area vesuviana»;
Vista la nota - prot. 1417 - del 13 aprile 2012, con cui la citata Commissione ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile il Documento «Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio» contenente anche lo studio e l'analisi della ricaduta sottovento di materiale piroclastico (lapilli e ceneri) da una colonna eruttiva di tipo sub-pliniano;
Vista la nota della Regione Campania - prot. n. 2189 - del 21 novembre 2014 con la quale vengono preliminarmente informati i Sindaci dei comuni interessati della proposta di definizione della Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale;
Vista la delibera della Giunta Regionale Campana n. 29 del 9 febbraio 2015, recante la «Delimitazione della Zona gialla del piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana», adottata in esito al predetto percorso informativo;
Vista la nota - prot. 1986 - del 6 febbraio 2014, con cui l'Istituto nazionale di geofisica e vulcanologia ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile il Rapporto «Studio statistico della dispersione di ceneri vulcaniche in caso di eruzione del Vesuvio»;
Vista la nota - prot. 64464 - dell'11 luglio 2014, con cui il Centro interdipartimentale LUPT, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli «Federico II», Centro Studi PLINIVS per l'ingegneria idrogeologica, vulcanica e sismica, ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile le elaborazioni conclusive previste dalla Convenzione quadro annuale DPC-PLINIVS/LUPT, ARES «Aggiornamento analisi di Rischio e di Scenario al Vesuvio e ai Campi Flegrei»;
Considerato che, alla citata Commissione e' stato attribuito il compito, tra gli altri, di predisporre un apposito Documento per la revisione degli scenari e dei livelli di allerta per il piano nazionale d'emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio;
Tenuto conto che il Dipartimento della protezione civile e la regione Campania, sulla base del Documento recante «Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio» e dei successivi approfondimenti scientifici in merito alla dispersione e ricaduta delle ceneri, hanno portato avanti le attivita' di competenza volte alla revisione del Piano nazionale d'emergenza e alla ridefinizione dei confini della «Zona gialla» del medesimo Piano, intesa come l'area soggetta ad alta probabilita' di accumulo di elevate quantita' di materiale piroclastico per la quale e' necessario prevedere la pianificazione nazionale di emergenza;
Ravvisata, pertanto, la necessita' di impartire indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza a seguito della ridefinizione della Zona gialla;
Considerato che, secondo lo scenario eruttivo di riferimento, la ricaduta di materiale piroclastico interesserebbe vaste aree del territorio con ripercussioni sulle attivita' ordinarie di vita;
Ravvisata la necessita' di provvedere ad una pianificazione di carattere nazionale per le aree del territorio interessate dalla ricaduta di materiale piroclastico, piu' prossime al vulcano ed esposte ai venti prevalenti, definite sulla base del citato documento contenete lo scenario eruttivo di riferimento;
Ravvisata, altresi', la necessita' di provvedere a fornire indicazioni operative per l'aggiornamento dei piani di emergenza anche alle restanti parti di territorio esposte al rischio di ricaduta di ceneri vulcaniche, non prospicenti al vulcano e non necessariamente esposte ai venti prevalenti;
Considerato altresi' che, nel corso della riunione del Comitato operativo della protezione civile del 13 maggio 2015 inerente il rischio vulcanico in Regione Campania e in particolare sulle attivita' di aggiornamento della pianificazione d'emergenza al Vesuvio, l'ipotesi di delimitazione della zona gialla e' stata condivisa con le componenti e le strutture operative del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile;
Su proposta del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile;
Acquisita l'intesa della Conferenza unificata nella seduta del 20 ottobre 2015;
Adotta le seguenti disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio
\n1. Definizione della Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale
\nLa Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale di emergenza per rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio e' l'area esposta a ricaduta di materiale piroclastico e comprende i comuni che ricadono anche parzialmente all'interno della curva di isocarico di 300 kg/m² (equivalenti a 30 cm di accumulo) con la probabilita' di superamento del valore di carico (300 kg/m²) pari al 5%, di cui all'Allegato 1 che costituisce parte integrante del presente provvedimento. Per tale area sara' necessaria l'adozione di specifiche misure di salvaguardia per la popolazione che prevedono l'intervento del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile, con strategie operative diversificate e attuabili in maniera dinamica sul territorio al momento dell'emergenza. L'area effettivamente interessata dalle fenomenologie citate con superamento dei valori di carico di cenere sopra indicati, infatti, non e' individuabile preventivamente, ma solo ad evento in corso. Accumuli di ceneri vulcaniche minori di 30 cm possono comunque interessare aree esterne alla Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale; in particolare nei comuni di cui agli Allegati 2 (mappa) e 3 (elenco) sono previsti accumuli di cenere superiori a 5 cm, sempre in riferimento a una probabilita' condizionata del 5% di superamento della soglia di carico specifica di 50 kg/m².
\n2. Indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza
\nIl Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile, d'intesa con la Regione Campania, sentita la Conferenza Unificata, provvede, entro cinque mesi dalla pubblicazione del presente provvedimento, a fornire alle diverse componenti e strutture operative del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile, le indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle rispettive pianificazioni di emergenza ai fini della salvaguardia della popolazione della Zona gialla. Nei successivi sei mesi ciascuna delle componenti e strutture operative destinatarie delle indicazioni fornite dal Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile, per quanto di competenza e ad integrazione di quanto previsto dalle rispettive procedure, provvede alla redazione, aggiornamento e adeguamento delle rispettive pianificazioni di emergenza. All'attuazione della presente direttiva si provvede esclusivamente nei limiti delle risorse finanziarie disponibili per gli scopi a legislazione vigente.
\nIl presente provvedimento ed i relativi allegati saranno inviati ai competenti organi di controllo e pubblicati nella Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica italiana.
\nRoma, 16 novembre 2015
\np. Il Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri: De Vincenti
\nRegistrato alla Corte dei conti il 15 dicembre 2015
Ufficio controllo atti P.C.M. Ministeri giustizia e affari esteri, reg.ne prev. n. 3085
Disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio per le aree soggette a ricaduta di materiale piroclastico - Zona gialla
Il Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri
Vista la legge 24 febbraio 1992, n. 225 recante: «Istituzione del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile» e successive modificazioni e integrazioni;
Visto il decreto legislativo 31 marzo 1998, n. 112, recante: «Conferimento di funzioni e compiti amministrativi dello Stato alle regioni ed agli enti locali, in attuazione del Capo I della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 59» ed in particolare gli articoli 107 e 108;
Visto il decreto-legge 7 settembre 2001, n. 343, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge 9 novembre 2001, n. 401, recante: «Disposizioni urgenti per assicurare il coordinamento operativo delle strutture preposte alle attivita' di protezione civile e per migliorare le strutture logistiche nel settore della difesa civile» ed in particolare: il comma 2 dell'art. 5, ove e' previsto che il Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri predisponga gli indirizzi operativi dei programmi di previsione e prevenzione dei rischi, nonche' i programmi nazionali di soccorso e i piani per l'attuazione delle conseguenti misure di emergenza; il comma 5 del medesimo art. 5 ove e' previsto che il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile rivolga alle amministrazioni centrali e periferiche dello Stato, delle regioni, delle province, dei comuni, degli enti pubblici nazionali e territoriali e di ogni altra istituzione ed organizzazione pubblica e privata presente nel territorio nazionale, le indicazioni necessarie al raggiungimento delle predette finalita';
Visto il decreto-legge 15 maggio 2012, n. 59, convertito, con modificazioni, dalla legge del 12 luglio 2012, n. 100, recante: «Disposizioni urgenti per il riordino della protezione civile»;
Visto il decreto-legge 14 agosto 2013, n. 93 convertito con modificazioni dalla legge 15 ottobre 2013, n. 119, recante: «Disposizioni urgenti in materia di sicurezza e per il contrasto della violenza di genere, nonche' in tema di protezione civile e di commissariamento delle province» e, in particolare, l'art. 10;
Vista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri 3 dicembre 2008, recante: «Indirizzi operativi per la gestione delle emergenze»;
Vista la direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri 14 febbraio 2014, recante «Disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio», con la quale viene definita la Zona rossa della pianificazione di emergenza nazionale per rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio e la relativa strategia di salvaguardia della popolazione a rischio tramite gemellaggi con le regioni e le province autonome italiane;
Visto il decreto 9 agosto 1993, n. 516, con cui il Sottosegretario di Stato alla protezione civile pro-tempore, ha istituito una Commissione incaricata di provvedere alla elaborazione di un piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana connessa a situazioni derivanti dal rischio vulcanico;
Visto il rapporto finale di detta Commissione approvato il 25 settembre 1995, concernente il Piano nazionale di emergenza dell'area vesuviana;
Visto il decreto del Ministro dell'interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 247 del 1° febbraio 1996, di costituzione della Commissione incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento del richiamato Piano di emergenza;
Visto il documento recante: «Aggiunte e varianti alle parti A3, B, C1 e C2 della pianificazione nazionale d'emergenza dell'area vesuviana» approvato dalla predetta Commissione nella riunione del 20 marzo 2001;
Visto il decreto del Ministro dell'interno delegato per il coordinamento della protezione civile di rep. n. 1828 del 18 giugno 2002 di ricostituzione della Commissione nazionale incaricata di provvedere all'aggiornamento dei piani di emergenza dell'area vesuviana e dell'area flegrea per il rischio vulcanico;
Visto il decreto del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile di rep. n. 698, del 6 marzo 2003 di nomina dei membri costituenti la suddetta Commissione;
Visto il decreto del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile 2 febbraio 2015, recante: «Indicazioni, alle Componenti ed alle Strutture operative del Servizio nazionale di protezione civile, inerenti l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza ai fini dell'evacuazione cautelativa della popolazione della Zona rossa dell'area vesuviana»;
Vista la nota - prot. 1417 - del 13 aprile 2012, con cui la citata Commissione ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile il Documento «Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio» contenente anche lo studio e l'analisi della ricaduta sottovento di materiale piroclastico (lapilli e ceneri) da una colonna eruttiva di tipo sub-pliniano;
Vista la nota della Regione Campania - prot. n. 2189 - del 21 novembre 2014 con la quale vengono preliminarmente informati i Sindaci dei comuni interessati della proposta di definizione della Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale;
Vista la delibera della Giunta Regionale Campana n. 29 del 9 febbraio 2015, recante la «Delimitazione della Zona gialla del piano di emergenza dell'area vesuviana», adottata in esito al predetto percorso informativo;
Vista la nota - prot. 1986 - del 6 febbraio 2014, con cui l'Istituto nazionale di geofisica e vulcanologia ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile il Rapporto «Studio statistico della dispersione di ceneri vulcaniche in caso di eruzione del Vesuvio»;
Vista la nota - prot. 64464 - dell'11 luglio 2014, con cui il Centro interdipartimentale LUPT, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli «Federico II», Centro Studi PLINIVS per l'ingegneria idrogeologica, vulcanica e sismica, ha trasmesso al Dipartimento della protezione civile le elaborazioni conclusive previste dalla Convenzione quadro annuale DPC-PLINIVS/LUPT, ARES «Aggiornamento analisi di Rischio e di Scenario al Vesuvio e ai Campi Flegrei»;
Considerato che, alla citata Commissione e' stato attribuito il compito, tra gli altri, di predisporre un apposito Documento per la revisione degli scenari e dei livelli di allerta per il piano nazionale d'emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio;
Tenuto conto che il Dipartimento della protezione civile e la regione Campania, sulla base del Documento recante «Scenari eruttivi e livelli d'allerta per il Vesuvio» e dei successivi approfondimenti scientifici in merito alla dispersione e ricaduta delle ceneri, hanno portato avanti le attivita' di competenza volte alla revisione del Piano nazionale d'emergenza e alla ridefinizione dei confini della «Zona gialla» del medesimo Piano, intesa come l'area soggetta ad alta probabilita' di accumulo di elevate quantita' di materiale piroclastico per la quale e' necessario prevedere la pianificazione nazionale di emergenza;
Ravvisata, pertanto, la necessita' di impartire indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza a seguito della ridefinizione della Zona gialla;
Considerato che, secondo lo scenario eruttivo di riferimento, la ricaduta di materiale piroclastico interesserebbe vaste aree del territorio con ripercussioni sulle attivita' ordinarie di vita;
Ravvisata la necessita' di provvedere ad una pianificazione di carattere nazionale per le aree del territorio interessate dalla ricaduta di materiale piroclastico, piu' prossime al vulcano ed esposte ai venti prevalenti, definite sulla base del citato documento contenete lo scenario eruttivo di riferimento;
Ravvisata, altresi', la necessita' di provvedere a fornire indicazioni operative per l'aggiornamento dei piani di emergenza anche alle restanti parti di territorio esposte al rischio di ricaduta di ceneri vulcaniche, non prospicenti al vulcano e non necessariamente esposte ai venti prevalenti;
Considerato altresi' che, nel corso della riunione del Comitato operativo della protezione civile del 13 maggio 2015 inerente il rischio vulcanico in Regione Campania e in particolare sulle attivita' di aggiornamento della pianificazione d'emergenza al Vesuvio, l'ipotesi di delimitazione della zona gialla e' stata condivisa con le componenti e le strutture operative del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile;
Su proposta del Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile;
Acquisita l'intesa della Conferenza unificata nella seduta del 20 ottobre 2015;
Adotta le seguenti disposizioni per l'aggiornamento della pianificazione di emergenza per il rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio
1. Definizione della Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale
La Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale di emergenza per rischio vulcanico del Vesuvio e' l'area esposta a ricaduta di materiale piroclastico e comprende i comuni che ricadono anche parzialmente all'interno della curva di isocarico di 300 kg/m² (equivalenti a 30 cm di accumulo) con la probabilita' di superamento del valore di carico (300 kg/m²) pari al 5%, di cui all'Allegato 1 che costituisce parte integrante del presente provvedimento. Per tale area sara' necessaria l'adozione di specifiche misure di salvaguardia per la popolazione che prevedono l'intervento del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile, con strategie operative diversificate e attuabili in maniera dinamica sul territorio al momento dell'emergenza. L'area effettivamente interessata dalle fenomenologie citate con superamento dei valori di carico di cenere sopra indicati, infatti, non e' individuabile preventivamente, ma solo ad evento in corso. Accumuli di ceneri vulcaniche minori di 30 cm possono comunque interessare aree esterne alla Zona gialla della pianificazione nazionale; in particolare nei comuni di cui agli Allegati 2 (mappa) e 3 (elenco) sono previsti accumuli di cenere superiori a 5 cm, sempre in riferimento a una probabilita' condizionata del 5% di superamento della soglia di carico specifica di 50 kg/m².
2. Indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle pianificazioni di emergenza
Il Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile, d'intesa con la Regione Campania, sentita la Conferenza Unificata, provvede, entro cinque mesi dalla pubblicazione del presente provvedimento, a fornire alle diverse componenti e strutture operative del Servizio nazionale della protezione civile, le indicazioni per l'aggiornamento delle rispettive pianificazioni di emergenza ai fini della salvaguardia della popolazione della Zona gialla. Nei successivi sei mesi ciascuna delle componenti e strutture operative destinatarie delle indicazioni fornite dal Capo del Dipartimento della protezione civile, per quanto di competenza e ad integrazione di quanto previsto dalle rispettive procedure, provvede alla redazione, aggiornamento e adeguamento delle rispettive pianificazioni di emergenza. All'attuazione della presente direttiva si provvede esclusivamente nei limiti delle risorse finanziarie disponibili per gli scopi a legislazione vigente.
Il presente provvedimento ed i relativi allegati saranno inviati ai competenti organi di controllo e pubblicati nella Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica italiana.
Roma, 16 novembre 2015
p. Il Presidente del Consiglio dei ministri: De Vincenti
Registrato alla Corte dei conti il 15 dicembre 2015
Ufficio controllo atti P.C.M. Ministeri giustizia e affari esteri, reg.ne prev. n. 3085
Pubblicata sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale n.13 del 18 gennaio 2016
\n\n","value":"
Pubblicata sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale n.13 del 18 gennaio 2016
"},"field_data":"2015-11-16T01:00:00+01:00","field_categoria_primaria":"normativa","field_codice_lingua":false,"fields":{"slug":"/normativa/direttiva-del-presidente-del-consiglio-dei-ministri-16-novembre-2015--disposizioni-per-l-aggiornamento-della-pianificazione-di-emergenza-per-il-rischi/"},"field_link":null,"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Portale"},"field_tipo_provvedimento":[{"drupal_internal__tid":460,"name":"Direttive del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri","field_etichetta_en":"President of the Council of Ministers directives"},{"drupal_internal__tid":458,"name":"Direttive, indirizzi operativi e raccomandazioni","field_etichetta_en":"Directives, operational addresses and recommendations"}],"field_immagine_anteprima":null,"field_immagine_dettaglio":null}}]}},"elenco":{"title":" Supplementary worksheet","field_titolo_esteso":"Supplementary worksheet","fields":{"slug":"/-supplementary-worksheet/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1374051}},"pageContext":{"slug":"/approfondimento/national-civil-protection-plan-volcanic-risk-vesuvius/","lang":"en","menu":[{"node":{"name":"Department","weight":135,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[]},"drupal_internal__tid":1474}},{"node":{"name":"Badges","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/badges/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900016840},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2453}},{"node":{"name":"Former executives","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/former-executives/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738096},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1520}},{"node":{"name":"Holders of executive positions","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/holders-executive-positions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738106},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1518}},{"node":{"name":"Holders of top management administrative positions","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/holders-top-management-administrative-positions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":793762},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1519}},{"node":{"name":"Register of companies and accreditation procedures","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/badges/register-companies-and-accreditation-procedures/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900017152},"parent":[{"name":"Badges","drupal_internal__tid":2453}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2465}},{"node":{"name":"Performance","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/performance/"},"drupal_internal__nid":150250},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1531}},{"node":{"name":"Procedural time monitoring","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/activities-and-procedures/procedural-time-monitoring/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737236},"parent":[{"name":"Activities and procedures","drupal_internal__tid":1546}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1548}},{"node":{"name":"Substitute declarations and ex officio acquisition of data","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/activities-and-procedures/substitute-declarations-and-ex-officio-acquisition-data/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737225},"parent":[{"name":"Activities and procedures","drupal_internal__tid":1546}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1549}},{"node":{"name":"Total amount of awards","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/performance/total-amount-awards/"},"drupal_internal__nid":794015},"parent":[{"name":"Performance","drupal_internal__tid":1531}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1534}},{"node":{"name":"404","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Homepage","drupal_internal__tid":1470}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1471}},{"node":{"name":"Absence rates","weight":7,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/absence-rates/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738046},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1525}},{"node":{"name":"Accessibility and catalog of data, metadata and databases","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/accessibility-and-catalog-data-metadata-and-databases/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737775},"parent":[{"name":"Other contents","drupal_internal__tid":1597}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1599}},{"node":{"name":"Activities","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/activities/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300002135},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1846}},{"node":{"name":"Activities and procedures","weight":7,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/activities-and-procedures/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737256},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1546}},{"node":{"name":"Administration payments","weight":14,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/administration-payments/"},"drupal_internal__nid":796389},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1576}},{"node":{"name":"Administrative management provisions","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/provisions/administrative-management-provisions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737340},"parent":[{"name":"Provisions","drupal_internal__tid":1552}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1554}},{"node":{"name":"Agreements signed by the administration","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/provisions/administrative-management-provisions/agreements-signed-administration/"},"drupal_internal__nid":794339},"parent":[{"name":"Administrative management provisions","drupal_internal__tid":1554}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1557}},{"node":{"name":"Archive of agreements signed by the administration","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/provisions/administrative-management-provisions/agreements-signed-administration/archive-agreements-signed-administration/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1047867},"parent":[{"name":"Agreements signed by the administration","drupal_internal__tid":1557}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1558}},{"node":{"name":"Awards data","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/performance/awards-data/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737896},"parent":[{"name":"Performance","drupal_internal__tid":1531}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1535}},{"node":{"name":"Budget and final balance","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/budgets/budget-and-final-balance/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737193},"parent":[{"name":"Budgets","drupal_internal__tid":1568}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1570}},{"node":{"name":"Budgets","weight":12,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/budgets/"},"drupal_internal__nid":636544},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1568}},{"node":{"name":"Checks","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/checks/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739434},"parent":[{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","drupal_internal__tid":1582}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1587}},{"node":{"name":"CIMA Foundation","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/controlled-private-law-entities/cima-foundation/"},"drupal_internal__nid":794079},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled private-law entities","drupal_internal__tid":1538}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1540}},{"node":{"name":"Civic access","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/civic-access/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737795},"parent":[{"name":"Other contents","drupal_internal__tid":1597}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1600}},{"node":{"name":"Code of Conduct and Disciplinary Code","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/general-acts/code-conduct-and-disciplinary-code/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738411},"parent":[{"name":"General acts","drupal_internal__tid":1502}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1507}},{"node":{"name":"Collective negotiation","weight":10,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/collective-negotiation/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738016},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1528}},{"node":{"name":"Competition announcements","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/competition-announcements/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738532},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1516}},{"node":{"name":"Concession acts","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/concession-acts/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737855},"parent":[{"name":"Economic Advantages","drupal_internal__tid":1560}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1562}},{"node":{"name":"Conferral requirements","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/conferral-requirements/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894080},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1490}},{"node":{"name":"Consultants and collaborators of the Department","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/consultants-and-collaborators-department/"},"drupal_internal__nid":742728},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2349}},{"node":{"name":"Contact Center","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/contact-center/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001715},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1602}},{"node":{"name":"Contacts","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/contact-center/contacts/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300002417},"parent":[{"name":"Contact Center","drupal_internal__tid":1602}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1604}},{"node":{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739484},"parent":[{"name":"Emergencies for meteo-hydro risk","drupal_internal__tid":1581}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1582}},{"node":{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of October 2018","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-october-2018/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1066704},"parent":[{"name":"Emergencies for meteo-hydro risk","drupal_internal__tid":1581}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1590}},{"node":{"name":"Controlled bodies","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/"},"drupal_internal__nid":149930},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1537}},{"node":{"name":"Controlled private-law entities","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/controlled-private-law-entities/"},"drupal_internal__nid":149940},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled bodies","drupal_internal__tid":1537}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1538}},{"node":{"name":"Controlled public bodies","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/controlled-public-bodies/"},"drupal_internal__nid":149880},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled bodies","drupal_internal__tid":1537}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1542}},{"node":{"name":"Criteria and modalities","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/criteria-and-modalities/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737865},"parent":[{"name":"Economic Advantages","drupal_internal__tid":1560}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1561}},{"node":{"name":"Deputy Head of Department","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/deputy-head-department/"},"drupal_internal__nid":796275},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1477}},{"node":{"name":"Diploma of public merit","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/diploma-public-merit/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894252},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1493}},{"node":{"name":"Donations","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/donations/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900012050},"parent":[{"name":"Other contents","drupal_internal__tid":1597}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2346}},{"node":{"name":"Economic Advantages","weight":11,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/"},"drupal_internal__nid":153187},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1560}},{"node":{"name":"Emergencies","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Emergenze"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1558},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1621}},{"node":{"name":"Emergencies for environmental, health, technological and fire risk","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-environmental-health-technological-and-fire-risk/"},"drupal_internal__nid":150374},"parent":[{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","drupal_internal__tid":1580}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1592}},{"node":{"name":"Emergencies for meteo-hydro risk","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/"},"drupal_internal__nid":741016},"parent":[{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","drupal_internal__tid":1580}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1581}},{"node":{"name":"Emergency Management Office","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/emergency-management-office/"},"drupal_internal__nid":796349},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1478}},{"node":{"name":"Eucentre Foundation","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/controlled-private-law-entities/eucentre-foundation/"},"drupal_internal__nid":794065},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled private-law entities","drupal_internal__tid":1538}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1539}},{"node":{"name":"European projects","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/european-projects/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900012016},"parent":[{"name":"Other contents","drupal_internal__tid":1597}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1601}},{"node":{"name":"Evaluation board","weight":12,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/evaluation-board/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737996},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1530}},{"node":{"name":"Events","weight":7,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Eventi"}},"drupal_internal__nid":395},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1628}},{"node":{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","weight":8,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":67641},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1498}},{"node":{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","weight":15,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1580}},{"node":{"name":"FAQ","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Emergencies for meteo-hydro risk","drupal_internal__tid":1581}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1589}},{"node":{"name":"Forms","weight":7,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/forms/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001717},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1607}},{"node":{"name":"General acts","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/general-acts/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738451},"parent":[{"name":"General dispositions","drupal_internal__tid":1500}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1502}},{"node":{"name":"General administrative acts","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/general-acts/general-administrative-acts/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738431},"parent":[{"name":"General acts","drupal_internal__tid":1502}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1504}},{"node":{"name":"General dispositions","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1500}},{"node":{"name":"Glossary","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/glossary/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1664},"parent":[{"name":"Homepage","drupal_internal__tid":1470}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1472}},{"node":{"name":"Graphic representation","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/graphic-representation/"},"drupal_internal__nid":740317},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled bodies","drupal_internal__tid":1537}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1541}},{"node":{"name":"Head of Department","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/head-department/"},"drupal_internal__nid":796260},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1476}},{"node":{"name":"Holders of political, administrative, management or government positions","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/organization/holders-political-administrative-management-or-government-positions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738381},"parent":[{"name":"Organization","drupal_internal__tid":1509}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1510}},{"node":{"name":"Homepage","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[]},"drupal_internal__tid":1470}},{"node":{"name":"How the contribution is dispensed","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/how-contribution-dispensed/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739444},"parent":[{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","drupal_internal__tid":1582}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1586}},{"node":{"name":"How to apply","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/how-apply/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739464},"parent":[{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","drupal_internal__tid":1582}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1585}},{"node":{"name":"Information obligations for citizend and firms","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/information-obligations-citizend-and-firms/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738401},"parent":[{"name":"General dispositions","drupal_internal__tid":1500}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1508}},{"node":{"name":"Informative on personal data processing","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/contact-center/informative-personal-data-processing/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300002119},"parent":[{"name":"Contact Center","drupal_internal__tid":1602}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1606}},{"node":{"name":"Insegna","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/insegna/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894264},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1494}},{"node":{"name":"Insurance claims and other contributions","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/insurance-claims-and-other-contributions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739454},"parent":[{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","drupal_internal__tid":1582}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1583}},{"node":{"name":"Integrated Plan of Activities and Organisation (PIAO) 2023-2025","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/integrated-plan-activities-and-organisation-piao-2023-2025/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900009362},"parent":[{"name":"General dispositions","drupal_internal__tid":1500}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2186}},{"node":{"name":"Integrative negotiation","weight":11,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/integrative-negotiation/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738006},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1529}},{"node":{"name":"International Relations","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Relazioni internazionali"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1550},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1622}},{"node":{"name":"International states of emergency","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/international-states-emergency/"},"drupal_internal__nid":740536},"parent":[{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","drupal_internal__tid":1580}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1593}},{"node":{"name":"Latest news","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Press area","drupal_internal__tid":1609}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1610}},{"node":{"name":"Legal Measure","weight":8,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/legal-measure/"},"drupal_internal__nid":4581},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1550}},{"node":{"name":"Legal publicity","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/legal-publicity/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900015313},"parent":[{"name":"Other contents","drupal_internal__tid":1597}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2408}},{"node":{"name":"List and register of beneficiaries","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/list-and-register-beneficiaries/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894294},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1496}},{"node":{"name":"Maps","weight":8,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Mappe"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1556},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1627}},{"node":{"name":"Media and Communication","weight":136,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[]},"drupal_internal__tid":1608}},{"node":{"name":"Media Kit","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Press area","drupal_internal__tid":1609}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1611}},{"node":{"name":"Meritorious Award","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001699},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1489}},{"node":{"name":"Minister","weight":134,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/minister/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900006702},"parent":[]},"drupal_internal__tid":2146}},{"node":{"name":"Mobility procedures","weight":9,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/mobility-procedures/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738026},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1527}},{"node":{"name":"Mortgage payments","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/concession-acts/mortgage-payments/"},"drupal_internal__nid":153207},"parent":[{"name":"Concession acts","drupal_internal__tid":1562}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1563}},{"node":{"name":"National Recovery and Resilience Plan objectives","weight":11,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Attuazione Misure PNRR"}},"drupal_internal__nid":900004848},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2016}},{"node":{"name":"National Service","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Servizio Nazionale"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1516},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1619}},{"node":{"name":"Office I – Volunteering, Traning and Assistance","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-i-volunteering-traning-and-assistance/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300002401},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1479}},{"node":{"name":"Office II - Risk Forecasting and Prevention","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-ii-risk-forecasting-and-prevention/"},"drupal_internal__nid":795130},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1480}},{"node":{"name":"Office III - Emergency Recovery","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-iii-emergency-recovery/"},"drupal_internal__nid":795657},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1481}},{"node":{"name":"Office IV - Technology Innovation and Telecommunications","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-iv-technology-innovation-and-telecommunications/"},"drupal_internal__nid":795798},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1482}},{"node":{"name":"Office V - International Activities and Relations","weight":7,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-v-international-activities-and-relations/"},"drupal_internal__nid":795844},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1483}},{"node":{"name":"Office VI - Human and Instrumental Resources","weight":8,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-vi-human-and-instrumental-resources/"},"drupal_internal__nid":100837793},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2421}},{"node":{"name":"Office VII - Administration and Budget","weight":9,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/office-vii-administration-and-budget/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900015419},"parent":[{"name":"Structure","drupal_internal__tid":1475}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1484}},{"node":{"name":"Offices outline","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/organization/offices-outline/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738361},"parent":[{"name":"Organization","drupal_internal__tid":1509}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1513}},{"node":{"name":"Organization","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/organization/"},"drupal_internal__nid":742829},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1509}},{"node":{"name":"Organizational positions","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/organizational-positions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738076},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1522}},{"node":{"name":"Organizational wellbeing","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/performance/organizational-wellbeing/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737886},"parent":[{"name":"Performance","drupal_internal__tid":1531}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1536}},{"node":{"name":"Other contents","weight":16,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737805},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1597}},{"node":{"name":"Payments data","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/administration-payments/payments-data/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737310},"parent":[{"name":"Administration payments","drupal_internal__tid":1576}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1577}},{"node":{"name":"Performance measuring and evaluating systems","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/performance/performance-measuring-and-evaluating-systems/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737926},"parent":[{"name":"Performance","drupal_internal__tid":1531}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1532}},{"node":{"name":"Performance plan and report","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/performance/performance-plan-and-report/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737916},"parent":[{"name":"Performance","drupal_internal__tid":1531}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1533}},{"node":{"name":"Permanent commission","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/permanent-commission/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894175},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1492}},{"node":{"name":"Personnel","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/"},"drupal_internal__nid":152494},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1517}},{"node":{"name":"Personnel assigned to offices and services of the Department","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/organization/personnel-assigned-offices-and-services-department/"},"drupal_internal__nid":742010},"parent":[{"name":"Organization","drupal_internal__tid":1509}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1511}},{"node":{"name":"Photo and video","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/photo-and-video-/"},"drupal_internal__nid":4585},"parent":[{"name":"Media and Communication","drupal_internal__tid":1608}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1615}},{"node":{"name":"Plan of indicators and expected budget results","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/budgets/plan-indicators-and-expected-budget-results/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737182},"parent":[{"name":"Budgets","drupal_internal__tid":1568}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1569}},{"node":{"name":"Political bodies provisions","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/provisions/political-bodies-provisions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737350},"parent":[{"name":"Provisions","drupal_internal__tid":1552}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1553}},{"node":{"name":"Premises","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/premises/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001709},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1487}},{"node":{"name":"Press area","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/media-and-communication/press-area/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300000472},"parent":[{"name":"Media and Communication","drupal_internal__tid":1608}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1609}},{"node":{"name":"Prevention of corruption","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/other-contents/prevention-corruption/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737785},"parent":[{"name":"Other contents","drupal_internal__tid":1597}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1598}},{"node":{"name":"Procedure for the conferral","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/procedure-conferral/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894164},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1491}},{"node":{"name":"Procedures data","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/provisions/administrative-management-provisions/procedures-data/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737330},"parent":[{"name":"Administrative management provisions","drupal_internal__tid":1554}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1555}},{"node":{"name":"Provisions","weight":9,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/provisions/"},"drupal_internal__nid":153362},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1552}},{"node":{"name":"Publications","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/publications/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1668},"parent":[{"name":"Media and Communication","drupal_internal__tid":1608}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1613}},{"node":{"name":"Q&A","weight":9,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Domande e risposte"}},"drupal_internal__nid":300000828},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1623}},{"node":{"name":"Q&A","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/contact-center/qa/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900013597},"parent":[{"name":"Contact Center","drupal_internal__tid":1602}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2396}},{"node":{"name":"Register of companies and procedures for accreditation","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/register-companies-and-procedures-accreditation/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894274},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1495}},{"node":{"name":"Regulations","weight":7,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/meritorious-award/regulations/"},"drupal_internal__nid":894342},"parent":[{"name":"Meritorious Award","drupal_internal__tid":1489}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1497}},{"node":{"name":"Regulatory references on organizations and activities","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/general-acts/regulatory-references-organizations-and-activities/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738441},"parent":[{"name":"General acts","drupal_internal__tid":1502}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1503}},{"node":{"name":"ReLuis Consortium","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/controlled-public-bodies/reluis-consortium/"},"drupal_internal__nid":794128},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled public bodies","drupal_internal__tid":1542}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1543}},{"node":{"name":"Rental and lease","weight":13,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/rental-and-lease/"},"drupal_internal__nid":150260},"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1571}},{"node":{"name":"Request of patronage","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/request-patronage/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001719},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1488}},{"node":{"name":"RETURN Foundation (Multi- Risk sciEnce for resilienT commUnities undeR a changiNg climate)","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/controlled-private-law-entities/return-foundation-multi-risk-science-resilient-communities-under-changing-climate/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900010280},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled private-law entities","drupal_internal__tid":1538}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2213}},{"node":{"name":"Risks","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Rischi"}},"drupal_internal__nid":440},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1620}},{"node":{"name":"Sanctions for failed data communication","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/organization/sanctions-failed-data-communication/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900000844},"parent":[{"name":"Organization","drupal_internal__tid":1509}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1512}},{"node":{"name":"Sanctions for failed data communication","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/sanctions-failed-data-communication/"},"drupal_internal__nid":793791},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1521}},{"node":{"name":"Service Features","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/contact-center/service-features/"},"drupal_internal__nid":100838033},"parent":[{"name":"Contact Center","drupal_internal__tid":1602}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1603}},{"node":{"name":"Sitemap","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/homepage/sitemap/"},"drupal_internal__nid":422},"parent":[{"name":"Homepage","drupal_internal__tid":1470}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1473}},{"node":{"name":"Social","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/media-and-communication/social/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001731},"parent":[{"name":"Media and Communication","drupal_internal__tid":1608}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1614}},{"node":{"name":"Special cases","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/special-cases/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739424},"parent":[{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","drupal_internal__tid":1582}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1588}},{"node":{"name":"States of emergency for seismic risk","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/states-emergency-seismic-risk/"},"drupal_internal__nid":740582},"parent":[{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","drupal_internal__tid":1580}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1591}},{"node":{"name":"States of emergency not managed by the Department","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/states-emergency-not-managed-department/"},"drupal_internal__nid":740513},"parent":[{"name":"Extraordinary and emergency interventions","drupal_internal__tid":1580}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1594}},{"node":{"name":"Strategic and management planning documents","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/general-acts/strategic-and-management-planning-documents/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738421},"parent":[{"name":"General acts","drupal_internal__tid":1502}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1505}},{"node":{"name":"Structure","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/structure/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001707},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1475}},{"node":{"name":"Subsidiary companies","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/subsidiary-companies/"},"drupal_internal__nid":740276},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled bodies","drupal_internal__tid":1537}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1544}},{"node":{"name":"Supervised public bodies","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/controlled-bodies/supervised-public-bodies/"},"drupal_internal__nid":740266},"parent":[{"name":"Controlled bodies","drupal_internal__tid":1537}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1545}},{"node":{"name":"Supplementary worksheet","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/-supplementary-worksheet/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1374051},"parent":[{"name":"Media and Communication","drupal_internal__tid":1608}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1612}},{"node":{"name":"Systematic equipment","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/systematic-equipment/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738066},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1523}},{"node":{"name":"Tasks assigned and authorized to public servants","weight":8,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/tasks-assigned-and-authorized-public-servants/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738036},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1526}},{"node":{"name":"Technical attachments to the ordinances for recognition of the requirements","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/legal-measure/technical-attachments-ordinances-recognition-requirements/"},"drupal_internal__nid":741657},"parent":[{"name":"Legal Measure","drupal_internal__tid":1550}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1551}},{"node":{"name":"Telephone and email","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/organization/telephone-and-email/"},"drupal_internal__nid":793720},"parent":[{"name":"Organization","drupal_internal__tid":1509}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1514}},{"node":{"name":"Temporary personnel","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/personnel/temporary-personnel/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738056},"parent":[{"name":"Personnel","drupal_internal__tid":1517}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1524}},{"node":{"name":"Tender and contract list","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Tenders and contracts","drupal_internal__tid":1559}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1878}},{"node":{"name":"Tenders and contracts","weight":10,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[{"name":"Transparent administration","drupal_internal__tid":1499}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1559}},{"node":{"name":"Thematic areas","weight":144,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":null,"parent":[]},"drupal_internal__tid":1617}},{"node":{"name":"Three-year plan for the prevention of corruption and transparency","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/general-dispositions/three-year-plan-prevention-corruption-and-transparency/"},"drupal_internal__nid":738461},"parent":[{"name":"General dispositions","drupal_internal__tid":1500}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1501}},{"node":{"name":"Total amount of debts","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/administration-payments/total-amount-debts/"},"drupal_internal__nid":900013313},"parent":[{"name":"Administration payments","drupal_internal__tid":1576}]},"drupal_internal__tid":2379}},{"node":{"name":"Training","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Formazione"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1566},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1624}},{"node":{"name":"Transfers for civil protecion emergencies","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/concession-acts/transfers-civil-protecion-emergencies/"},"drupal_internal__nid":990363},"parent":[{"name":"Concession acts","drupal_internal__tid":1562}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1564}},{"node":{"name":"Transfers for national and international civil protection exercises","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/concession-acts/transfers-national-and-international-civil-protection-exercises/"},"drupal_internal__nid":152541},"parent":[{"name":"Concession acts","drupal_internal__tid":1562}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1565}},{"node":{"name":"Transfers ruled by art.11","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/concession-acts/transfers-ruled-art11/"},"drupal_internal__nid":795880},"parent":[{"name":"Concession acts","drupal_internal__tid":1562}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1566}},{"node":{"name":"Transfers to the Regions for the management of hydro-meteo-pluviometric networks","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/economic-advantages/concession-acts/transfers-regions-management-hydro-meteo-pluviometric-networks/"},"drupal_internal__nid":149758},"parent":[{"name":"Concession acts","drupal_internal__tid":1562}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1567}},{"node":{"name":"Transparent administration","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/sezione-con-anticipazioni/transparent-administration/"},"drupal_internal__nid":399},"parent":[{"name":"Department","drupal_internal__tid":1474}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1499}},{"node":{"name":"Type of damage and goods elegible for contribution","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/extraordinary-and-emergency-interventions/emergencies-meteo-hydro-risk/contributions-meteo-hydro-events-may-2013/type-damage-and-goods-elegible-contribution/"},"drupal_internal__nid":739474},"parent":[{"name":"Contributions for meteo-hydro events of May 2013","drupal_internal__tid":1582}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1584}},{"node":{"name":"Types of procedure","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/transparent-administration/activities-and-procedures/types-procedure/"},"drupal_internal__nid":737246},"parent":[{"name":"Activities and procedures","drupal_internal__tid":1546}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1547}},{"node":{"name":"Volunteering","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Volontariato"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1568},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1618}},{"node":{"name":"Write to Contact Center","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/contact-center/write-contact-center/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001729},"parent":[{"name":"Contact Center","drupal_internal__tid":1602}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1605}},{"node":{"name":"Young people","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/"},"relationships":{"field_sottodominio":{"name":"Giovani"}},"drupal_internal__nid":1546},"parent":[{"name":"Thematic areas","drupal_internal__tid":1617}]},"drupal_internal__tid":1625}}],"menuFooter":[{"node":{"name":"Certified mail PEC","weight":3,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/approfondimento/certified-e-mail-pec/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300000300}},"drupal_internal__tid":1890}},{"node":{"name":"Contacts","weight":6,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/approfondimento/contacts/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001713}},"drupal_internal__tid":1893}},{"node":{"name":"Glossary","weight":0,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/glossary/"},"drupal_internal__nid":1664}},"drupal_internal__tid":1887}},{"node":{"name":"Legal notes","weight":5,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/approfondimento/note-legali/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001711}},"drupal_internal__tid":1892}},{"node":{"name":"Modules","weight":2,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/department/forms/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001717}},"drupal_internal__tid":1889}},{"node":{"name":"Online services","weight":1,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/approfondimento/online-services/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001701}},"drupal_internal__tid":1888}},{"node":{"name":"Privacy","weight":4,"relationships":{"field_link_menu":{"fields":{"slug":"/approfondimento/privacy-0/"},"drupal_internal__nid":300001705}},"drupal_internal__tid":1891}}],"socialImg":null}},"staticQueryHashes":[]}